Tento mapper bezne taguje pre renderrer.

"Ale ked na https://www.freemap.sk/?map=17/49.128509/19.421538&layers=X to vyzera tak pekne ;-)"

Hello,

I have checked Maxar Premiom and even much better source in Slovakia - Ortofotomozaika SR (for example https://www.freemap.sk/?map=20/48.987681/22.449477&layers=Z) and no doubt you can't see a culvert. The problem is that to see a culvert you must be looking from a sinde, not from a top as every aerial imagery is about.

I think ford (water flowing across a road) is much easier to see in such otrhophotos than culvert, but I saw no fords in Maxar Premium. In Ortofotomozaika SR I saw either clear road without water or areas covered by trees or shadow.

I think you should revert such ford tagging unless you did a local survey.

In Slovakia we have many nodes sharing both waterway and highway which are not fords. Those were mapped by mapper "Mirecnet" because of his lack of correct mapping knowledge.

Thanks in advance

Hello. You hhave placed fords on nodes shared by both highway and stream. Did you survey it that those are really fords and not eg. culverts?

Bing by som na SK zakazal. Mame ovela lepsie zdroje, momentalne Ortofoto mozaiku. Alebo aspon Maxar.

Toto sa uz riesilo na https://groups.google.com/d/msg/osm_sk/Ua0jG6s69dA/SbvXIV4vBAAJ

Prosim nerobte z uzlov ktore najdete na cestach a hraniciacj vrcholy. Na to vytvorte novy bod.

preco ste prosim zmazali dolinu "Kamenná dolina"?

Aky je zdroj tejto zmeny? Tag source ste nechali "kapor2" aj import_ref je stary.

To bude asi zmena kvoli https://groups.google.com/d/msg/osm_sk/japbV7QqleE/Hk9tSvkoAQAJ

Ahoj. Pozeram ze ked si kreslil potoky z ZBGIS, tak si pri krizovani sa s cestou potok predelil a usek dal s layer=-1. To vsak nie je spravne. Na danom mieste kludne moze byt brod, alebo most (vtedy sa predeluje cesta). Prosim ak dane miesto nepoznas, tak nechaj cestu a potok prekrizeny bez dalsich uprav. A samozrejme bez spolocneho bodu. A ak mozes tak prosim oprav tie predely, ja po dnesnom prieskume terenu som uz 2 odstranil.

Prosim ta nespajaj plochy (landuse, ...) s cestami. Hrozne sa to edituje a opravuje.

Naviac slovicko "Letisko" do name velmi nepatri.

do name tagu urcite text "(cez pole)" nepatri

BTW if you don't like rendering on Carto map then you should report it to https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues and not to tag for Carto renderrer.

It is not "OSM themselves". It is just Mapnik Carto style on OSM. Then also host other map layers.

BTW the same map doesn't show red hiking trails. What about to tag them with highway=trunk? That map shows it nicely in red.

Sorry, thet was just an example to show that your assumptions are just wrong. Please read again that linked wiki article posted by Isidor.

Thanks.

Vratil som tuto moju zmenu, hoci https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/?bm=zbgis&z=16&c=19.494620,48.654487#

https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/?bm=zbgis&z=16&c=19.441341,48.681412#

Isidor is right. Please revert.

Ano, to je aj moja otazka :-). Mne to pride podstatne lahsie pre routovac, dokonca prirodzene, kedze pre pesie routovanie maju chodniky vyssiu vahu ako cesty a tak su automaticky preferovane. Avsak renderovac nema ako zistit ci pre danu cestu neexistuje nablizku vhodny chodnik. To by musel obsahovat aj routovac.

Tiez mi napadlo, ze na mnohych cestach je dokonca subjektivne, ci ich este moze chodec pouzit alebo nie. Niektory policajt povie ze OK, najblizsia obchadzka po chodniku je "az" 10 minut peso a iny policajt povie ze je "len" 10 minut peso. Pripadne niekto je viac mobilnejsi, niekto menej a policajt moze posudzovat podla toho. Tym padom aj foot=no na mnohych tychto cestach moze byt casto subjektivne a tym padom IMHO nevhodne davat do OSM.

Suhlasim. Aj o tom zakone viem. Ale nechat by sme to mali na router. Ten foot=no mi trochu vadi o.i. preto, lebo napr. na mape https://www.freemap.sk/?map=17/48.720060/21.245708&layers=X renderuje na vsetkych cestach v KE zakaz pre pesich (cervene X). Tiez ten foot=no mi pride redundantny, kedze je default (blizko je chodnik). Nevravim ze je tam chybne...