osm.org/note/2622238

osm.org/note/2622379

osm.org/note/2622381

osm.org/note/2622241

osm.org/note/2622380 partially

osm.org/note/2622383

osm.org/note/2622385

osm.org/note/2622384

osm.org/note/2622231

osm.org/note/2622230

osm.org/note/2622232

osm.org/note/2622234

osm.org/note/2622378

not note 262, but osm.org/note/2620692

I'm don't currently know whether work has started or not. I've added a note at osm.org/note/2614022 to remind me to check it as soon as I'm able, and if anyone else checks first, than that's something sorted anyway.

Apologies, I hadn't fully twigged that it was only proposed. I apologise for the confusion, and hopefully I haven't made any other errors, and nor will I do so in the future. Thanks for spotting and fixing it.

also MK rose

Are you sure way 875820704 should be bicycle=no? Would it not be used to access the bicycle store in Block B?

Is the grass by the Tesco Express really called "Linslade Tesco Express"? I've never seen it called that, and it seems odd. Where did the information come from?

This fixed note osm.org/note/2469837