I think they should be highway=footway, highway=living_street implies it is still constructed as a street imo, whereas these are simply named footpaths

Not all bus-only roads are automatically highway=busway. See osm.wiki/Tag:highway=busway#Similar_infrastructure - "Any section of bus-only roadway that only leads into a bus station should be tagged with highway=service + access=no + bus=designated."

It was brought to my attention that you changed the classification of the Main street Station bus access roads to highway=busway, and then later I reverted them back to highway=service. I believe that highway=service is the correct tag given the caveat given at osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway#Similar_infrastructure : "Any section of bus-only roadway that only leads into a bus station should be tagged with highway=service + access=no + bus=designated." Does that seem right to you?

I believe the "Busway" name is somewhat of a misnomer, it's not used by public transit.

I mostly wanted to get rid of the giant duplicate "Jersey City" label on the map from way 659474186.

However, as I understand landuse=residential, it only refers to the predominant use, so shops can exist in a landuse=residential area, and landuse can be refined down over time.

This particular landuse area is much broader than I would probably draw myself if done from scratch, so I'd encourage you to refine it if you have the time :)

A state highway being tertiary is rather unusual at least, there's only a few examples in the whole state: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Eois
In any case, it seems more major than other highway=tertiary, which are usually play a collector role. ILDOT classifies this portion of IL 25 as Minor arterial and IL 31 as a principle arterial.

Go for it:) Just remember to add the place=neighbourhood nodes to the relation with the role "label". Mappers often overlook this.

This road was a highway=primary "stub-end", which contradicts the "Connectivity principle" that is outlined here: osm.wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance#Classification.

It's a state highway serving as a connection between two relatively large settlements.

I don't see an Overlook Park, do you mean Overlook Farms? If so, I didn't draw it unfortunately, I was just the last person to touch it ;)

Here you go: https://storage.googleapis.com/juniper-media-library/23/2023/09/2021-10-25_Hales_Corners_Comprehensive_Plan_-_ADOPTED_.pdf on page 35

I don't believe access=psv is valid. To tag that it is only for buses one would use access=no + bus=yes.

I believe this may be "tagging for the renderer" (see osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer) , as each block is now tagged as a neighborhood. It also duplicates the information already tagged as place=city_block

I'm not sure that this belongs in OSM given that we do not map temporary features in OSM: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features

Hi,
Ja, iD und JOSM warnen darüber, wenn man versucht einen Weg zu löschen, der teil einer Relation steht. (in iD muss man erst den Weg aus die Relation entfernen, um einen Weg zu löschen)
LG
Alex

I noticed you created a new node for the Town of Westport: osm.org/node/11038494320. A node for this town already exists: osm.org/node/3062413378

(A Wisconsin "Town" is mostly equivalent to other states' "Townships" and therefore are place=municipality rather than place=town or place=village)

While I can understand if you don't want to spend the time to map with that much detail, is there any advantage to removing this detail? At least in my opinion, this sort of detail could be useful so cyclists can know that this bike lane isn't completely separated.

I removed the Bike route on Greenfield from 76th-60th Street in osm.org/changeset/121072364 as there are no signs as far as I can tell.

Ich habe nachgesucht, und place=borough wird sehr selten in Deutschland benutzt, und 91% der Benutzungen von diesem Tag sind in einer Region in Spanien und im US-Staat Pennsylvania wo es bedeutet etwas mehr wie Gemeinde in Deutschland. Deswegen halte ich place=borough für keine gute Idee. Bad Godesberg war früher als place=town getaggt. Vielleicht war das korrekt?

Did the city change this section of road such that bikes no longer need to share the road with traffic (sharrow)?: osm.org/way/315089480