I believe this may be "tagging for the renderer" (see osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer) , as each block is now tagged as a neighborhood. It also duplicates the information already tagged as place=city_block

I'm not sure that this belongs in OSM given that we do not map temporary features in OSM: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features

Hi,
Ja, iD und JOSM warnen darüber, wenn man versucht einen Weg zu löschen, der teil einer Relation steht. (in iD muss man erst den Weg aus die Relation entfernen, um einen Weg zu löschen)
LG
Alex

I noticed you created a new node for the Town of Westport: osm.org/node/11038494320. A node for this town already exists: osm.org/node/3062413378

(A Wisconsin "Town" is mostly equivalent to other states' "Townships" and therefore are place=municipality rather than place=town or place=village)

While I can understand if you don't want to spend the time to map with that much detail, is there any advantage to removing this detail? At least in my opinion, this sort of detail could be useful so cyclists can know that this bike lane isn't completely separated.

I removed the Bike route on Greenfield from 76th-60th Street in osm.org/changeset/121072364 as there are no signs as far as I can tell.

Ich habe nachgesucht, und place=borough wird sehr selten in Deutschland benutzt, und 91% der Benutzungen von diesem Tag sind in einer Region in Spanien und im US-Staat Pennsylvania wo es bedeutet etwas mehr wie Gemeinde in Deutschland. Deswegen halte ich place=borough für keine gute Idee. Bad Godesberg war früher als place=town getaggt. Vielleicht war das korrekt?

Did the city change this section of road such that bikes no longer need to share the road with traffic (sharrow)?: osm.org/way/315089480

Laut das wiki: "place=suburb wird bei OpenStreetMap für die Teile einer Stadt auf der obersten Ebene verwendet". In Bonn das heißt Bonn, Bad Godesberg, Hardtberg und Beuel (die vier Stadtbezirke). Die Ortsteile sind kleiner: zum Bespiel, das Ortsteil Villenviertel liegt in Bad Godesberg.

Why did you change "North Vel R. Phillips Avenue" to "Vel R. Phillips Ave"? The streets should have the directional qualifier if they have it and "avenue" shouldn't be abbreviated. See osm.wiki/Abbreviations

Also wenn Du behauptest, dass das Mappen des Radwegs durch getrennte Wege hier inkorrekt ist, sollen die Details des Radwegs noch bleiben (bspw cycleway:right:oneway=no usw)

reverted in osm.org/changeset/138304170

reverted in osm.org/changeset/138304056 for probable vandalism

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/138176990 due to probable vandalism, see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=19493420 for details

It appears you have deleted these offramps again (despite them still existing). Can you explain what you are trying to achieve?

Was adding access=private to this part of Jeffery Boulevard a mistake?: osm.org/way/57006954

What mostly needs work in your opinion?

It appears that now the cycleways here are now mapped twice: Once as tags on the roads, and once as highway=cycleway ways. Probably it makes sense to map some as separate ways (around the Washington & Clark/Dearborn bus stop for example), while others make much more sense as tags (sharrows as Washington & State, painted line on Michigan)

The crossing ways should at least have bicycle=yes, given it is perfectly legal to ride along the crossing. (otherwise routers may think you need to walk your bike across the road, something that some trails require) I'd argue that bicycle=designated is still correct, given it is still part of the OLT, it's just crossing the road

I'm inclined to just consider it a long shared driveway to the hangers and post office. In any case, I don't believe it should be named S Howell Ave because it is not signposted as such (as far as I can see), and it is very confusing to get a turn instruction to turn onto howell avenue if you are on howell avenue already