OpenStreetMap
Adam Franco's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 136595346 | over 1 year ago | Glastonbury has a population of 9. It is not a place=town, but rather a place=hamlet. |
| 136589905 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136589957 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136595517 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136595721 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136595960 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136596173 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136596658 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136604121 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136604219 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136604561 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136605548 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136635367 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136640466 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136640581 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136640702 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136669242 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 136671445 | over 1 year ago | It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town".
Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12 |
| 126526266 | about 2 years ago | I'm planning a canoe trip through Saint Regis next week and just wanted to thank you for mapping the camp sites. It will make finding them so much easier. :-D |
| 136557358 | about 2 years ago | I don't know yet, but I hope to find out soon! :-) |