Adam Franco's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
145819774 | over 1 year ago | Hi @scarapella, I just noticed the use of this little waterway=link way via the new map produced that shows the end-points of flows in waterways:
I've not seen the waterway=lnk tag used before, but if that is important to map I'd suggest flipping the direction of osm.org/way/1236467015 so that it goes into the Allagash River instead of diverting the Allagash river's flow out. See also:
|
146716157 | over 1 year ago | Once again, please join the community conversation before changing place=* values at
The place=* tag is for the the importance of the community relative to its region, not for the incorporation status. Incorporation status can be placed in the border_type=* tag on the boundary relation for the municipality as is seen in this example: osm.org/relation/170184#map=13/44.4938/-71.2237
|
146716051 | over 1 year ago | Once again, please join the community conversation before changing place=* values at
The place=* tag is for the the importance of the community relative to its region, not for the incorporation status. Incorporation status can be placed in the border_type=* tag on the boundary relation for the municipality as is seen in this example: osm.org/relation/170184#map=13/44.4938/-71.2237
|
146715751 | over 1 year ago | Once again, please join the community conversation before changing place=* values at
The place=* tag is for the the importance of the community relative to its region, not for the incorporation status. Incorporation status can be placed in the border_type=* tag on the boundary relation for the municipality as is seen in this example: osm.org/relation/170184#map=13/44.4938/-71.2237
|
146714808 | over 1 year ago | Once again, please join the community conversation before changing place=* values at
The place=* tag is for the the importance of the community relative to its region, not for the incorporation status. Incorporation status can be placed in the border_type=* tag on the boundary relation for the municipality as is seen in this example: osm.org/relation/170184#map=13/44.4938/-71.2237
|
146714679 | over 1 year ago | Once again, please join the community conversation before changing place=* values at
The place=* tag is for the the importance of the community relative to its region, not for the incorporation status. Incorporation status can be placed in the border_type=* tag on the boundary relation for the municipality as is seen in this example: osm.org/relation/170184#map=13/44.4938/-71.2237
|
146714633 | over 1 year ago | Once again, please join the community conversation before changing place=* values at
The place=* tag is for the the importance of the community relative to its region, not for the incorporation status. Incorporation status can be placed in the border_type=* tag on the boundary relation for the municipality as is seen in this example: osm.org/relation/170184#map=13/44.4938/-71.2237
|
146714597 | over 1 year ago | Once again, please join the community conversation before changing place=* values at
The place=* tag is for the the importance of the community relative to its region, not for the incorporation status. Incorporation status can be placed in the border_type=* tag on the boundary relation for the municipality as is seen in this example: osm.org/relation/170184#map=13/44.4938/-71.2237
|
146691013 | over 1 year ago | Once again, please join the community conversation before changing place=* values at
The place=* tag is for the the importance of the community relative to its region, not for the incorporation status. Incorporation status can be placed in the border_type=* tag on the boundary relation for the municipality as is seen in this example: osm.org/relation/170184#map=13/44.4938/-71.2237
|
145079854 | over 1 year ago | Please do not unilaterally change place name classification without reading and participating in the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878 |
145079816 | over 1 year ago | Please do not unilaterally change place name classification without reading and participating in the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878 |
145079433 | over 1 year ago | Please do not unilaterally change place name classification without reading and participating in the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878 |
145079418 | over 1 year ago | Please do not unilaterally change place name classification without reading and participating in the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878 |
145079400 | over 1 year ago | Please do not unilaterally change place name classification without reading and participating in the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878 |
145079334 | over 1 year ago | Please do not unilaterally change place name classification without reading and participating in the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878 |
145079368 | over 1 year ago | Please do not unilaterally change place name classification without reading and participating in the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878 |
145079271 | over 1 year ago | Please do not unilaterally change place name classification without reading and participating in the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878 |
145079271 | over 1 year ago | Please do not unilaterally change place name classification without reading and participating in the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878
|
131322006 | over 1 year ago | I'd suggest that Montpelier should be a place=town rather than bumping Barre. I'd argue that only Burlington (and *maybe* Rutland) would qualify as place=city. |
142509440 | over 1 year ago | Hi SSGHOKAGE, if this road is wide enough for 2-track vehicles, then highway=track or highway=unclassified would be more appropriate. highway=path is used for walking paths, bike paths, and other ways too narrow for cars and trucks. If this road is part of the general-purpose road network and would be used by residents to drive between properties, then highway=unclassified is a good option. If it is a forest road only used to access timber stands or the land itself, then highway=track is a good value.
|