I'm confused, you say "updating leaf type", but this doesn't seem to be a tree. It's an address node, and there is a confusing building tag, too. Can you clarify what you intended to map with this feature?

Can you add more information about this government office? What is its name? What type of office is it?

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! But in the future, if you are going to make edits in several different places in the world, can you do them as separate changesets? It makes it easier to see what happened that way.

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

In this case leisure=garden is valid tagging for a private garden. To clarify that it's not public space, you could add access=private instead of deleting it.

See: osm.wiki/Tag:leisure=garden

Hi there, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

This node only has a "name" tag, but no other tags to tell us what it is. Can you give some more detail about it?

Hi! Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! In this case, however, you don't need to add a node for the park, because there is already a polygon that represents the whole park. A node in the middle of the park is redundant in case, so I deleted it.

👍

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! However, the W Hotel is already tagged on the building feature, so we don't need it as a node. Here's the building that we already have: osm.org/way/232080299

Hi, you probably need to add some tag like amenity=car_repair so it will show up on the map.

I'm not sure if archaeological_site is appropriate, but that was the original tag, so I left it for now.

Hi, it looks like you were trying to describe the Semiahmoo Indian Reservation? I added more tags to this feature, although you're right that we probably need to confirm the proper boundary. Possibly this will help us: osm.wiki/Geobase/Canadian_Aboriginal_Lands

I see you actually created several of these park tags on nodes. Maybe that was an error? Try not to add tags to nodes that are part of other features. In most cases, nodes that are part of other shapes (like lines or areas) shouldn't have any tags on them.

I see you changed this from a footway to a cycleway? I've been on this trail before, and I can see that you might be right. Thanks for this edit to OSM.

HI Willy, please only add parks that exist and can be verified. It looks like this was a park tag that you added to a node? I see someone has already correctly deleted it.

Thanks for contributing to OSM! I changed the tags on the footpath a little bit. In OSM where we need to list multiple values for something (in this case the surface) we usually use a semi-colon. However, if possible it would be more useful to just pick the predominant surface type. If you had to choose just one, which would it be?

Looks good, thanks for joining OpenStreetMap! I slightly tweaked the format of the opening hours information. It doesn't need underscores after the days of the week.

Looks good, thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

Is this a real street, or just a driveway? It's hard to tell from the satellite imagery, but if you've verified it on the ground, we'll trust you.
Also, is the name of this street correct? You gave the name "Comust", but it connects to a road called "Comus". I assume one of these is incorrect?

Hi Steve, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! It looks like you created an area feature without any tags. If it's a wetland (which I guess from your changeset comment), it needs an additional tag to clarify that, so it will show up on the map.

Hello! Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!
You probably want to add at least one more tag to that node, so that OSM knows what type of feature it is. Maybe shop=something? osm.wiki/Key:shop