Hi there, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for contributing!

Can I ask about the place_of_worship you just added? denomination=sunni and religion=buddhist aren't two things that usually go together. Is one of those an error?

Hi there, thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap! As far as I can tell, "Ontario and 59th Park" is not an official park according to the City of Vancouver: http://vancouver.ca/parks-recreation-culture/parks-gardens-and-beaches.aspx

Are you sure that this isn't just part of the school grounds which are already mapped? Can you provide any documentation (like a photo of a sign, maybe) to prove that this exists as a separate park?

Hi there! Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. One thing to watch out for: when you make a lot of edits one after the other, make sure you update the changeset comment to correctly reflect what you're adding in each edit. For example, this isn't "Sea-mountain Insurance". Otherwise, keep up the good work!

Hi there! Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. One thing to watch out for: when you make a lot of edits one after the other, make sure you update the changeset comment to correctly reflect what you're adding in each edit. For example, this isn't a "Residential Home". Otherwise, keep up the good work!

Hi there! Welcome to OSM.

You've got it right by adding building=house to this polygon. But landuse=residential should be used for larger areas, not buildings. This house is already surrounded by a landuse=residential polygon, for example: osm.org/way/545333507

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for contributing!

For now I'm just going to delete that park, and we can re-create it once we have some confirmation on the ground.

Hi there, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Looking at the satellite imagery, I don't see a park there. It looks like the park that you drew covers up several existing buildings. Is this a mistake?

Sounds awesome! Enjoy!

Cool. Are you placing these points based on your own survey, or are you importing the coordinates from NOAA? I just wonder, because those two benchmarks you placed don't quite align with the existing peaks in OSM.

Please do not delete the building.

Please do not delete the building.

Please do not delete the building.

Please do not delete this building? If you are a new mapper, please ask for help. But I assume you are connected to all of the other recent hotel edits that resulted in deleted buildings.

Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

It looks like you accidentally created a new node while updating the old one, resulting in duplicate nodes. I'm going to delete the new node and make sure the old one contains all the relevant information.

Hello there, please don't delete the existing building. If you are the same user who is editing a bunch of other hotels in the last few hours, please stop for a moment and ask for advice.

user_5359, this is the first edit by a new user. Their changeset message is "update listing", and their username is "qualityinnblythe", so I don't think they were trying to delete the building on purpose. The probably just don't know how OSM works yet. Please assume good intentions before throwing around the word "vandalism".

Thanks for adding the Dangermond Preserve! I changed the tagging to something that seems more appropriate according to wiki.osm.org. Great work adding the boundary!

Are we sure that Cole Harbour should be tagged as natural=bare_rock instead of natural=water, as it was before this changeset? bare_rock seems very wrong here.

Hello! Thank you for editing OpenStreetMap!

You created a lot of features that have area=yes, which does not give us much information. I think these should all be building=yes instead.