Hi,

I was working in the area of this changeset and saw that you had added a surface tag to a way that's currently tagged as a track.

way id:320167785

The track tag was applied long ago and I don't think it's correct. Many old tracks have been widened and are in continual use so my feeling is that this is an unclassified, unpaved highway. But I haven't been there and you have.

What's your opinion?

Hello,

I came across s island in the Clea Lakes that is possibly a crannog which also has the name=Crannog. Is "Crannog" an actual name that can be found on a map?

Or did you mean it as a description rather than a name?

Thank you

Okay, thanks for the information. I added the ref tag to the sections of the old ชม.4038, and split that road at the coords you provided.

Ban Bhubing?

This section was also once tagged as 1004, right?

I did see a couple of milestones on the section of road just past the campground having ref=ชม.ถ1-0035.

I assumed they applied only to that short section and not the whole way.

Can I assume that highway classification applies to the entire stretch of highway from the traffic circle atBan Bhu

It's not the 1004 I'm talking about but the smaller road that heads north to Ban Khun Chang Khian. It has id:54460506 and the ref, marked by a couple of signs, is ชม.4038.

I was just up there yesterday and can verify that the route ref signs are still present.

Hello,
It seems you removed the ref tag from the road that goes to the Hmong village on Doi Suthep. My tag source:ref clearly says that the ref appears on signs along the way.

Is there some reason you removed the ref tag?

I will add the ref tag again today.

Funny coincidence: I just noticed some other trail segments tagged with name=Pre's Trail that I'm sure are incorrect. I just haven't had time to fix them.

My guess is that the name got propagated onto those segments by accident. I'll bicycle over to Alton Baker Park at some point and try to straighten those issues out but I'm fairly certain that the way you referred to above isn't part of Pre's Trail.

Hi Bernhard,

I'm visiting the Krung Ching waterfall area and the position where you placed it is wrong. I hiked part of the way to it this morning but did not reach the falls. We turned back because it was much farther than we expected.

So, I removed the name tag from your waterfall node but I cannot intelligently relocate it. Maybe I'll find another reference to Krung Ching Waterfall somewhere and then add it to OSM at that time.

I removed the oneway. I recall (faintly) that the last section of road was closed or oneway due to the heavy construction last time I was there about a month ago but at this point, I'm not sure

I don't recall changing it but if I did it was probably unintentional. However, there is a lot of construction going on at the intersection of the 114 and the Superhighway so maybe those "minor edits" I did were bad. I haven't directly edited the 1102 for a long while.

Let me have a look. I'm tied up planning my next day's lodging for a big trip I'm on down south so I can't get to it right away.

There are other issues as well. You have some nodes with name=road striping, for example, and name=street side ???

What are these?

Hello,

I came across this connector road and I cannot understand why it is part of three turn restrictions. If I look at it on Streetview, it appears to be a simple one-way slip ramp from the left lane of 340 to the Frontage Road.

As I see it, none of the turn restrictions are necessary. It's a short ramp, one-way, going between two one-way highways. Also, nobody is going to make a U-turn there, but yet you have added a no U-Turn restriction.

Can you explain why you mapped this road the way you did?

Thanks,

Dave

It was a minor edit and not automated. I looked at each of about 10-12 shops and removed the amenity=supermarket tag if present and added shop=supermarket instead. Some of the objects had both tags. In those cases, I simply deleted the deprecated tag.

On second look, it was not you that added the Start and End points of Trail No 3.

I think those are both incorrect but I'll check further before deleting them.

Thanks again for your help and cooperation.

Okay, thank you for the info. I intend to delete the old trail and add the name:en=Trail 9 to your adjusted one. You also tagged a node on that same way with tourism=attraction and name=Trail no.3 Start.

Can I assume that node is actually the start of Trail no 9? If so I would think it would be good to change the tagging to highway=trailhead,
name:en=Trail No. 9, and remove the tourism=attraction tag.

Does that sound reasonable to you?

Hi,

Thanks for your work in Khao Yai NP a few years ago. I have some questions about it.

You "adjusted" a trail in this changeset, left a "fixme" on a nearby trail, "Trail no. 9" saying that it was inaccurate and should be removed but you didn't remove it yourself. I am left to wonder if the new trail should replace the other inaccurate one, but you didn't add any name to the adjusted trail.

Why did you do it that way? It leaves other mappers with several questions about how to proceed. Does your new "path" replace the old Trail No 9?

I am not in the park now but I'm trying to check details before my trip there in December so I can't do a ground survey. Can you recall your reasoning in this case?

Thanks,

Hi,

First off, let me thank you for the huge effort you've put into OSM in the Eugene area. When I first visited Eugene as an OSM mapper about 6-7 years ago, it was a mess. You've clarified and enhanced the entire area.

There is one thing I would ask, however. When you are adding farmland, wood, etc. please don't attach any of their bounding nodes of those polygons to highways. It makes it very difficult to edit those wooded areas later.

It's also not really correct. A wooded area does not extend to the midpoint of a highway. A park boundary might do that but not a landuse.

Again, many thanks,
Keep up the good work!

I think one of us can safely delete these strange lines. user:wdcrawford hasn't responded and what we're left with doesn't make sense without some more tags.

Hi,

I came across a node you added called Franklin Perch tagged with natural=cliff in Eugene near the Spliff Cliff. I cannot find any reference to it on the Internet. Perhaps it's a local name for this place?

If it's not officially named Franklin Perch I'd suggest changing the "name" tag to "loc_name" and changing the natural=cliff tag to either tourism=viewpoint or tourism=attraction.

What do you think?