I removed the oneway. I recall (faintly) that the last section of road was closed or oneway due to the heavy construction last time I was there about a month ago but at this point, I'm not sure

I don't recall changing it but if I did it was probably unintentional. However, there is a lot of construction going on at the intersection of the 114 and the Superhighway so maybe those "minor edits" I did were bad. I haven't directly edited the 1102 for a long while.

Let me have a look. I'm tied up planning my next day's lodging for a big trip I'm on down south so I can't get to it right away.

There are other issues as well. You have some nodes with name=road striping, for example, and name=street side ???

What are these?

Hello,

I came across this connector road and I cannot understand why it is part of three turn restrictions. If I look at it on Streetview, it appears to be a simple one-way slip ramp from the left lane of 340 to the Frontage Road.

As I see it, none of the turn restrictions are necessary. It's a short ramp, one-way, going between two one-way highways. Also, nobody is going to make a U-turn there, but yet you have added a no U-Turn restriction.

Can you explain why you mapped this road the way you did?

Thanks,

Dave

It was a minor edit and not automated. I looked at each of about 10-12 shops and removed the amenity=supermarket tag if present and added shop=supermarket instead. Some of the objects had both tags. In those cases, I simply deleted the deprecated tag.

On second look, it was not you that added the Start and End points of Trail No 3.

I think those are both incorrect but I'll check further before deleting them.

Thanks again for your help and cooperation.

Okay, thank you for the info. I intend to delete the old trail and add the name:en=Trail 9 to your adjusted one. You also tagged a node on that same way with tourism=attraction and name=Trail no.3 Start.

Can I assume that node is actually the start of Trail no 9? If so I would think it would be good to change the tagging to highway=trailhead,
name:en=Trail No. 9, and remove the tourism=attraction tag.

Does that sound reasonable to you?

Hi,

Thanks for your work in Khao Yai NP a few years ago. I have some questions about it.

You "adjusted" a trail in this changeset, left a "fixme" on a nearby trail, "Trail no. 9" saying that it was inaccurate and should be removed but you didn't remove it yourself. I am left to wonder if the new trail should replace the other inaccurate one, but you didn't add any name to the adjusted trail.

Why did you do it that way? It leaves other mappers with several questions about how to proceed. Does your new "path" replace the old Trail No 9?

I am not in the park now but I'm trying to check details before my trip there in December so I can't do a ground survey. Can you recall your reasoning in this case?

Thanks,

Hi,

First off, let me thank you for the huge effort you've put into OSM in the Eugene area. When I first visited Eugene as an OSM mapper about 6-7 years ago, it was a mess. You've clarified and enhanced the entire area.

There is one thing I would ask, however. When you are adding farmland, wood, etc. please don't attach any of their bounding nodes of those polygons to highways. It makes it very difficult to edit those wooded areas later.

It's also not really correct. A wooded area does not extend to the midpoint of a highway. A park boundary might do that but not a landuse.

Again, many thanks,
Keep up the good work!

I think one of us can safely delete these strange lines. user:wdcrawford hasn't responded and what we're left with doesn't make sense without some more tags.

Hi,

I came across a node you added called Franklin Perch tagged with natural=cliff in Eugene near the Spliff Cliff. I cannot find any reference to it on the Internet. Perhaps it's a local name for this place?

If it's not officially named Franklin Perch I'd suggest changing the "name" tag to "loc_name" and changing the natural=cliff tag to either tourism=viewpoint or tourism=attraction.

What do you think?

I just noticed the same strange tags. If wdcrawford doesn't respond soon, I'd suggest deleting those lines.

Hello Julien,

I don't have a problem with that.

Dave

On second look, it appears I did incorrectly extend Hemlock Avenue.
I edited it to remove my error and added the Tiger 2020 name.

It looks as though all I did was add surface=gravel. I somehow missed the name issue you mentioned as well as the duplicate ways. DOH!

I do not know the correct name because I haven't been there but I would use the Tiger 2020 info if I were looking at it now.

Thanks for the note. Feel free to follow your instincts on this.

Indeed. I forgot to include the tag,
old_name=Sears Mall. Feel free to add it yourself if you wish, Hans.

Hi Adam,

There seem to be two separate, almost identical relations for the Yaquina Bay State Recreation Site (id:11,911,719 and id:11,911,720).

I'm not sure you created them but might you know what's going on?

Thanks,
Dave

No problem.

No problem. Things change quickly in Thailand. I added this building five years ago and used imagery that was not as good as what is available now. Please feel free to update anything I added that long ago

I looked at that location but can see no buildings.
Can you help me understand your comment better?