Just curious, if new municipalities are formed by merging old municipalities and some communities, as stated, should then admin_level=6 relation contain some wider area? This change looks like same area just got upgraded to higher authority level. By my understanding this specific relation is admin_level=8 and new admin_level=6 relation should be created. What is your opinion on this?

Hi 5m4u9,
can you recheck way 849362440 it does not look like a roundabout

Hi CaptainCarte,

I have seen that you have put note: DO NOT MERGE, this coastline segment is part of a maproulette task that will break if merged on way 1289692139

I do understand that you may have some issues with MapRoulette, but this way you are breaking coastlines. I have corrected the coastline in this small segment, I hope your MR task is still working, but if not, do not revert it since it will break coastlines once again.

Hi Ksusha Zhegolko,
I saw that you changed administrative to economic boundary. Can you describe why, which source is used to remove administrative boundary?

Sorry for the late reply. I thin I covered them all, but if I have missed some, please fix them or send me the list

OK, makes sense. You can exclude them If you know which ones or you want me to keep just mainland ?

Can you point me to which page you are referring to? New Harbor was village, you have change it to neighbourhood, but it does not look like one.

I saw that you made some changes from hamlets to neighbourhoods, can you tell me more why, since these look more like hamlets, which was tag before you made a change

Hi cmxn.
I saw that you have put Bay Harbor as neighbourhood, but on Mapillary https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.364014018174004&lng=-85.01739947273802&z=19.9&pKey=599023915596991&focus=photo&x=0.25584480937977394&y=0.6126571653854522&zoom=1.2925026399155226 it says The Village at Bay Harbor. Maybe place=village would be more precise?

Hi Takyk,
I have seen that you have changed admin_level for Arkadag şäheri from 6 to 4. I can not access the webpage you have added as a source. Can you please recheck your edit and if this still needs to be admin_level=4 relation, then adjust the boundaries of other admin_level=4 relations, now there is an overlap.

Hi jptolosa,
per Wiki it looks like all islands are included ("consists of a string of bedrock islands"), but also states that it is a mainland, so I am not sure which claim is more accurate. If you think islands should not be part of the relation you can exclude them

I have seen that on https://gis.ny.gov/civil-boundaries/ but there is also part of Mamaroneck that needs to be added to that relation, and the third part is that Tiger data is showing different polygon so since it was not clear what is final solution, I have just fixed the broken boundaries in a way it is functional. Please if you have the knowledge of how this relation should look like fix the members of the existing relation.

Sorry if this caused some trouble on your side, but there was broken relation so I made correction just to make it functional.

Hi adas,
can you fix Barzowice admin_level=8 relation, it is not closed polygon, since you have created Rusinowo and Wicie you might know the correct borders?

Hi BerserkRaul,

You have deleted boundary within this changeset. Can you fix it?

Hi 1T-money,
can you explain why you have changed admin_level=5 to admin_level=6 in this changeset, since per osm.wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries admin_level=5 are Districts (Arrondissements) and admin_level=6 are Search-And-Rescue sectors (temporary).

I think you should revert your changes

It is OK to realign them, but you have created double coastlines with lot of overlaps. Just realign existing geometries and be carefull not to break any relations that migh have coastline as a member, usualy these are administrative ones.

Santanaloba53,
please remove all population data that you have wrongly added in all your changesets

Please stop adding coastlines you are making overlaps and doubling existing coastlines. I will revert this changeset and all others with the same issue .

Hi Koistinenpäivää,
can you check osm.org/way/129210241 this should be building not natural=water

Hi Lennardderudder,

This was done in communication with the community. These are statistical boundaries; some were added with SETTLEMENT and SETTL_NAME tags then we wanted to fill missing data and to unify the tagging. At that moment, the community was against adding name tags, so we agreed to change the original tags to ref:settlement and ref:name accordingly. I see now that ref:settlement has been changed to ref:IE:census2015 which makes sense.

It was a part of adding OSi National Statistical Boundaries - 2015 after we obtained the waiver osm.wiki/PermissionsIreland

If you have agreed within the community to change it to another tag, I will be glad to help.