Don't worry woodpecker, this was more for Elizabeth BS, disputes can be resolved with disputed_by and claimed_by tags, but not with wrong boundaries or corrections just in your opinion. My suggestion in all disputed regions is to create 2 relations, one de facto and one de jure, with claimed_by and disputed_by and everything is then mapped correctly, both variants are present. There are many disputed territories around the world with a larger area than this one river island and all local communities are having a chat and found solution that works for them all. Just by finding some map does not mean you should go over and apply it.

Hi, Elizabeth BS, stop making some changes that are not accurate even according to your source. I have georeferenced it and fixed everything, but you keep adding some boundaries which are not accurate. Then woodpeck_repair revert distroyed it also. I will fix this one again. Everybody in the world know about famous Tres Fronteras and how it looks.

Hi Abdhmir,
I see that you have removed admin_level=6 relation and created new with admin_level=5 value. Can you also add admin_level=6 relations for this area?

Can you check your edit for Tanauan, it looks suspicious that is admin_level=4 since it is already under osm.org/relation/1504427

This does not seem like correct admin_level, since it is already under admin_level=4 relation osm.org/relation/1504761 Can you double check your edit?