Aleksandar Matejevic's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
157197839 | 11 months ago | Hi MK1,
|
157107643 | 11 months ago | I do not think this is a correct edit, this is a disputed area, but if you have knowledge of correct boundaries, than you will have to fix all state administrative boundaries, disputed ones and Admin2 in Bhutan. |
157107643 | 11 months ago | Are you referring to osm.org/way/1318305948 |
157078508 | 11 months ago | I have fixed them, but they are broken again, and there is some discussion on another changeset osm.org/changeset/157107643 |
157107643 | 11 months ago | Hi, you have deleted boundary between Bhutan and Tibet. If this boundary is not correct, then you should add the correct one. This way both states have invalid boundaries which is bigger issue. Can you correct the boundary or I need to revert it to last known state? |
156092265 | 11 months ago | Hi FoxeKing,
|
156660436 | 11 months ago | Hi แดนสรวง วงศ์สรรคกร,
|
113866155 | 12 months ago | Hi MK1,
|
156437614 | 12 months ago | Hi,
|
156110503 | 12 months ago | Hi Garmin-User,
|
134822756 | 12 months ago | Hi Russ,
|
155279861 | about 1 year ago | I have reverted this changeset because you have created a large number of overlapping coastlines that were already present on OSM. Please review your work and not to make this type of mistake (I think it was unintentional but I just wanted to point this out to you). Happy mapping |
155236500 | about 1 year ago | Hi Q8Maps. Thanks for updating boundaries. Can you please use subarea as a role for members that you currently map as inner members, because blocks are subareas of these relations, but when you add them as inner, this means they are excluded from the relation. |
154687793 | about 1 year ago | As you mentioned with tag [place=island](osm.wiki/Tag:place%3Disland) it should not be used on a relation but to be drawn as a counterclockwise area (because water is always on the right hand side). Relation should be created when the coastline is split into several smaller segments, for example, for creating smaller admin divisions or coastline of the island has more than 2000 nodes (for very detailed or large islands). Then you need a relation for the whole island. In some cases, the relation is used to group some close islands which have the same name but are not archipelagos.
|
154687793 | about 1 year ago | Yes, I am familiar with that, but why have you created relations for islands that are already tagged on a polygon? |
154046864 | about 1 year ago | Hi Bayu Adi Styawan,
|
154687793 | about 1 year ago | Hi osminng,
|
153638102 | about 1 year ago | Hi manahel mahmedfaruok nazmi,
|
152800630 | about 1 year ago | Thanks, that answers my question, got it. |
152800630 | about 1 year ago | Like this one osm.org/relation/17728786 It is admin_level=6 which has area that covers containing admin_level=8 relations. Is this intention of your edit or there is no more admin_level=8 relation here? |