Every comment and suggestion is highly appreciated by our team. In these cases, you have mentioned ways may have a larger number of nodes than needed, but we do take care not to over node all the ways we are creating. For example, in straight ways, you will find very few nodes, just not to have long segment issues in inspector tools, and across South America, there was a massive number of deleted nodes done by our team for overnoded ways. I have read the post you have posted here and we do get aware of these large databases issues, and we will pay extra attention to these details in our future work. Thanks for the collaboration, I hope you are satisfied with our contribution in general.

We are using JOSM to trace aerial imagery for the missing roads as precisely as it can be. So far we never had an issue that someone is complaining about our work in terms of how accurate geometry looks. In our work, we are also fixing approximate way issues that are caused by under node representation of ways. Also I this way 301863751 looks like a total disaster. Since there is no limit about this on OSM Wiki, can you point me to that OSM Weekly because I could not find any article about this issue?

HI mariotomo, can you be more specific about the number of nodes, you consider these ways under noded or over noded?

Hi JJIglesias, can you be more specific about this one, miroslavuzice87 did not and any Unclasified road, he has fixed unconnected way and added track, so can you specify the way(s) that you are pointing as false classification?

Hi, can you recheck this roundabout, it can not be seen on any imagery, it looks like an error

Hi pantufla,
thanks for the comment.
Can you be more specific, I don't know what is the way you are referring to and where it does not exit?

Hi CodyNZL,
you have flagged borovac on osmcha for fictional mapping because of an error that you have created in changeset 96954114

https://osmcha.org/changesets/96954114/

You have moved node 7663126784 to a new position and created bad geometry on 2020-01-05 and then you have deleted way in this changeset and created a new one.

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/7663126784

Just pay attention before flagging someone.

Best regards,
Aleksandar

highway=turning_loop sorry for the mistake in the previous comment

Actually this is a turning loop - A widened area of a highway with a non-traversable island for turning around, often circular and at the end of a road. This should be modeled as a node with a highway=turning_circle key. OSM has a render for it. These segments usually do not have a one-way sign because their usage is to ease access to the houses so it is up to locals how they gonna use it.

Sorry for that, JOSM changed the comment because I was using the scroll wheel before I clicked upload, so it picked last used one

Thanks,
I would also not count it as lane if it is not wide enough.

Hi aharvey,

Thank You for comment.

According to mapbox mapping guides for adding turn lanes, Yes, access restricted areas are not considered as lanes.

But there is a good explanation for painted islands in Australia:
https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/roads/safety-rules/road-rules/road-markings.html

What this means is that you can drive over painted island for up to 50m to enter turn lane, so it must be considered as "lane" in that segment.

Having a painted "no access" lane is to discourage drivers from cutting across it.

Lot of users across OSM are using access:lanes=no|| for tagging painted islands.
For this small segment I would leave it with access:lanes key.

Best regards,
Aleksandar

Po Odluci o utvrđivanju naziva i ulica i drugih delova naseljenih mesta na teritoriji opštine Aleksinac, član 46. stav 5. zvanično ime je Barežka. Ispravio sam š u ž u name:sr_Latn. Hvala puno na komentaru, ne bih tako lako uočio grešku.

Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au

Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au

I was looking at High Street, ref:C801. Should the road classification be changed to trunk instead of secondary because it looks like trunk to me and also C754 is set as trunk but it has same class (C)?

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-37.68576268&lng=144.59764168&z=17.536228955699563&focus=photo&pKey=2292vN5DNd79Otbzxup0xQ

This is key automatically created from task done in Tasking Manager. I have removed all of them. Thanks for hint

Hi aaronsta,

I was fixing above junction, so I devided Anzac Road until next roundabout because on Esri Worl Imagery you can clearly see island with threes between ways. On DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery which is older date imagery, there was no island. I have also taken this fact in consideration and presumed that island was build in order to prevent accessing opposite way to avoid car accidents.

Considering there is an island i connected Lynton Street only to one way. I did not know that you can drive over island (because driving rules do not allow it), and it looked logical to me to use roundabout to access opposite direction because it is not so far away.

However, thank you for comment and for pointing out that you are allowed to cross road with painted island.

Best regards,
Aleksandar

Hi Warin61
thank You for this. I have deleted duplicated way. The problem that caused this were difficulties with downloading/uploading to OSM server that day.
Once again, thanks for the info

Hi mrpulley,
I was correcting some road names in Victoria and I would like to double check with You if the name for way 47576012 is still Gum Flat Creek Road because in all up-to-date sources name for this road is Moyhu-Meadow Creek Road. Can You confirm that name is still Gum Flat Creek Road, or if that is an old or local name?
Best regards,
Aleksandar