It is nr 44, not nr 45.

To be honest, I dont even remember anymore what I was thinking back then when I put that poi. Looking that it was created on OsmAnd, I most likely was figuring out how to add poi within OsmAnd crumblesome very basic options of map editing. Guess just forgot to remove the test poi back then. Fix is right up! Thank you for the help!

Never mind, I already see the changes, understand now what you meant. Thank you for that.

Hello! For clarification of "If the road in a passing direction is NOT separated by a curb, you do not need to draw it as a separate road, this is an additional lane on an existing road.". Did you mean those lanes that were turning away?

Hello, sure thing.

By default the set of tags are general=yes but other tags are undefined. I see the situation as basically like when the last time you mentioned the crossings where I forgot to put yes tag for pedestrians and/or cyclers where applicable.
I'd say same is here because marked pedestrian and cycling crossing also by default does not have yes tag for pedestrians.
Even more so, wiki about the living street says that "Terms for these street vary considerably around the world." which means that in our case I would set the tags for such roads.
Otherwise I would say highway=cycleway, crossing=marked should already allow walking and does not need explicit yes tag for crossing.

I think i fixed all of them now.
Added "designated" tag to those crossings for pedestrians and for some crossings also added same tag for cyclists. Please review so that I can fix those mistakes.