Hello!

This and many other of your recent changesets deleted address nodes and data from buildings. The addresses are imported and upkept by latvia-bot with VZD data, so they are always correct and deleting them is useless since the bot will just re-add them later, e.g. as was already done with osm.org/node/9840991965/history and osm.org/node/10064602161

Thanks

Hello, I highly doubt that access=no tag is to be used on these areas. They are more likely access=private areas, and even then, access tags can't be automatically added to parking, playgrounds, sport pitches without surveying the area.

access=no is used on military facilities and other illegal objects to general public [1]

[1] osm.wiki/Tag:access%3Dno

It is, but it's supposed to be drained and filled in until July 2023

From the wiki you linked - "landuse=grass does not always describe a land use, it often describes a landcover." [1]

Doing a quick overpass turbo query shows that the landcover= tag has been used for a total of 7 times in whole of Latvia.
Not to mention that in the rest of the world, landuse=grass is 145 times more popular than the landcover alternative.

It just seems disrespectful and random to delete widely accepted landuse=grass areas, and not even replace them with anything else.

[1] osm.wiki/Land_use#Challenges_mapping_land_use

Hello, grass areas in between entrances at 56.95915,24.00793 (with IDs 1016901576 1016901577 1016901578 1016901575 1016901574 1016901573 1016901572) were deleted. Three grass patches at 56.96371,24.02126 (with IDs 1009097300 1009097996 1009097995) were deleted. Two grass multipolygons were deleted at 56.95788,24.01074 (with IDs 13541386 13541387). Also grass at 56.94832, 24.01773 apartment courtyard was mapped in a lot more detail than the one to the left of it.
Can you please explain the reason for these deletions of detail?

Hello, please don't vandalise. It's not a good use of your time and the changes will have to be reverted.

Labdien, palaboju dažas neprecīzas ēkas un nākotnē mēģināšu atcerēties norādīt source :)

Alright, will keep in mind next time