Hello elpanzer,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. In this edit, I observed that you have renamed a way from `Sodomy` to `Dirty Sanchez` which looked suspicious. Can you please confirm that a cycle way exists by this name? `name` tags are to be only used to denote the actual name of the way. Use `description` to indicate any details of the way.
Please refer to the following wiki:
- osm.wiki/Key:name
- osm.wiki/Key:description
Let me know if you need further help.

Thank you.

Hello gshockfreak,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for you contribution. In this changeset, observed that you have added an area and added `building=yes` tag. osm.org/way/488309612 But the `building=*` cannot be used to indicate the boundary. The building tags are used to trace only the actual buildings
Refer to the wiki,
osm.wiki/Key:building
This area could be denoted using `landuse=residential` tag.
wiki: osm.wiki/Key:landuse

Thank you.

Hello HCrockett,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contribution. In this edit you added a well and also added the `name=well` tag. This is not the general practice and `name` tag is used to indicate specific names. Please be careful during your further edits.
Thank you.

Hello Ryan Yantz,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for you contribution. In this changeset, observed that you have added an area and added `building=yes` tags for the following ways.
- osm.org/way/487527496
- osm.org/way/487527494

But the `building=*` cannot be used to indicate the boundary. The building tags are used to trace only the actual buildings
Refer to the wiki,
osm.wiki/Key:building
Thank you.

Hello Lucas Madrigal,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for you contribution. In this changeset, observed that you have added an area and added `building=school` tag. osm.org/way/462181526/ But the `building=*` cannot be used to indicate the boundary. The building tags are used to trace only the actual buildings
Refer to the wiki,
osm.wiki/Key:building

Thank you.

Hello Cristocracies,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and Thank you for your contributions. In this edit, I observed that you have added a tag `landuse=ground cover` for a park which is an invalid tag. Please refer the wiki for details and appropriate tags. osm.wiki/Key:landuse
Have deleted the invalid tag. Please be careful during your further edits.

Thank you.

Hello Strolj,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for you contribution. In this changeset, observed that you have modified an area and added a tag `building=yes` osm.org/way/28593656. But the correct tag would be to use `landuse=*` to represent an area like this which already has the actual buildings traced inside the boundary. The building tags are used to trace only the actual buildings and not to indicate the boundary of a complex.
Refer to the below wikis,
- osm.wiki/Key:building
- osm.wiki/Key:landuse

Let me know if you need any further help.

Thank you.

Hello robertosigala,
Welcome and Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset, I observed that you have a changed the tag of an `administrative boundary` to a `footway`. Can you please provide a verifiable source for this? Please map the features which exists in reality. The edit to admin boundary has been reverted. Please be careful during your further edits.
Thank you.

Hello jammypixpoodle,
Welcome and thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. In this edit, I observed in this edit that you have added a pond which doesn't seem to exist in the imagery and the source in this changeset says `Bing aerial`. Could you please provide a verifiable source ? This kind of edit where the features doesn't exist in reality is considered as a bad edit. Hence, this feature has been removed from the map. Please be careful during your further edits.
Thank you.

Hello YoJa Store,
Welcome and thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset, I observed that you have deleted a multipolygon residential building which is visible in satellite imagery. Would you please provide a verifiable source to validate this edit.

Thank you

Hello Joe Shatee,
Welcome and thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. I observed in this changeset you have added these ways haphazardly without any tags which would be considered as a bad edit. This way has been deleted. osm.org/way/485610887 Please be careful during your further edits.
Thank you.

Hello DerPendler,
Welcome and thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. I observed that you have been adding description for gate in the `name` tag. But these are supposed to be added in the `description` tag and not in the name tag. Would be great if you could correct these and add appropriate tags for your further edits. Refer to the wiki: osm.wiki/Key:description
Happy mapping! :-)

Thank you

Hello,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing to open data. In this changeset, I observed that you have added a `leisure=park` in a residential area. Would you please provide a verifiable source to verify this? This seems to be a fictional park when inspected over different imageries. These edits are considered as harmful and I am reverting this edit. Please be careful for your further edits and add only those features which exists in reality.

Thank you

Hello modeng,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I appreciate your interest in mapping and contributing to open data. But in this changeset, I observed that you are adding fictional features such as `cemetery` as a way which doesn't seem to exist in the reality when overlaid on top of satellite imagery. This is considered as an harmful edit to the map. Please be careful during your further edits.

Thank you.

Hello Andooresu,
Welcome and thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. I observed in this changeset that you have created a forest which does not seem to exist in reality when viewed over satellite imagery. Please do not map fictional features on OpenStreetMap and please be careful during your further edits. Deleting the feature that has been added as a forest.

Thank you.

Hello Ronald Licayan,
Welcome to OenStreetMap. I observed that you added a castle which seems to be suspicious and looks not to exist in reality. Reverted the changes by deleting the feature. Please be careful on your further edits. Could you please share a verifiable source for this edit ?

Thank you.

Hello tilandro,
Welcome and thank your for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. I observed in this changeset that you have a described a route in the `name` tag. Would be great if you could insert the actual name of the road (if any) in `name` tag and the details under `description` tag. Refer wiki: osm.wiki/Key:description

Thank you.

Welcome and thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. I observed that in this changeset, a river was tagged as natural = riverbank which is an unconventional tag that is being used for rivers. Refer this wiki: osm.wiki/Key:natural. The appropriate tag would be either `waterway=riverbank` or `natural=water + water=river`. Ref: osm.wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank
Thank you

Hello,
Welcome and Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. I observed that you deleted to places on the map. Would be great if you can justify this deletions. This edit is considered as harmful change to the map. Please be careful for your further edits. Would be reverting this changeset.

Thank you.

Hello,
Welcome and Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. But in this changeset I observed that you have deleted various buildings in the locality. The imagery in the region is not great and the existence of these buildings could not be verified. Could you please provide a verifiable source ?

Thank you.