Height and Min Height were set to the same value 228 meters, which was clearly wrong.

I looked at photos of the building, and it seems like the mapper was trying to create two towers starting at 228 meters.

The 228m/228m would render silly on a 3D map, and thus to keep things simple I removed both the bad data and tag. Had I renamed the tag, the data was broken.

Standardize tags

Normally the Dero stations are sold as a two part kit: pump & repair stand. Other brands integrate the pump into the stand.

No, brand=Dero does not apply.

However service:bicycle:pump=no is misleading... as in fact there's a pump nearby. Interesting quandary how to tag.

The tag you used is for self-repair-tools.
osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_repair_station

Use shop=bicycle I think for the guy.

shop=bicycle is the right tag for a bike shop.

Could you check your tagging on opening_hours_1 for this shop? osm.wiki/Key:opening_hours

Is there a brand marked on the tool stand?

For osm.org/node/3189070584/history is that a shop? The bike repair station tag is for 24/7 tool stands mostly.

For osm.org/node/3362196884/history what brand is that? Is there an air pump?

Could you explain osm.org/node/3377295062/history
Is this open 24 hours a day?
Is it free?
Is this a shop?
What vendor made this tool stand?

If this is a bicycle shop, the shop tag is the one you want.

Thanks on the tool stand. Could you confirm there are really TWO of these right next to each other, as currently mapped?

Added missing tree tag.

Added "natural=tree_row" to ways such as osm.org/way/247452825/history

See also https://www.mail-archive.com/tagging@openstreetmap.org/msg04437.html
and
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2010-September/004454.html

The policy followed for this edit was: osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

The tag came from user Nop, who used it in his rendering. He no longer does this, in part because the tag is not useful for it. His bot was controversial at the time and was partially reverted. Nop did not wish the cluster tag to be abandoned, but agreed to not oppose the edit.

It was a mistake to introduce cluster in the first place (see the entire heated debate with Nop in the archives), and now it's fixed.

Objects that could be cleaned up per usual mapping standards at the same time were cleaned up.

The DWG (data working group) was notified, in advance, due to the size of the edit and the global nature.

Perhaps you could define the meaning of denotation=cluster, and ask if it has present day value? How would you design that tag today?

Your changeset comment says "gps trace and knowlege", yet these tags look like an import osm.org/changeset/24221392 . What's up?

Replaced "unsurfaced" with "surface=dirt".
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2015-March/110698.html

Changed "traffic signals" to "turning circle" on osm.org/node/523118438/