ChehrehBargi's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
137440461 | almost 2 years ago | باسلام، ضمن تقدیر از زحمات شما
|
137240799 | almost 2 years ago | سلام ضمن تقدیر از زحمات شما
|
141848569 | almost 2 years ago | کلمه اول توضیحات، اشتباه تایپی است. |
123542620 | almost 2 years ago | سلام
|
139065265 | almost 2 years ago | با سلام و تقدیر از زحمات شما
|
126582574 | almost 2 years ago | سلام
|
123252036 | almost 2 years ago | سلام ضمن تشکر از تلاش شما
|
139252965 | almost 2 years ago | 1- According to osm.wiki/Good_practice, your statement applies to tents, not buildings. And my registrations are for buildings, so they are not temporary. It may be considered as abandoned, but you should not delete it because every complication is fixed on the ground and must be recorded.
|
139252965 | almost 2 years ago | LockOnGuy@
|
139252965 | almost 2 years ago | Regarding the inscription: In the new stone that was used, the summary is stated and my explanation is a more complete description. If the problem is only that, you should have corrected the inscription instead of erasing every place that I record. |
139252965 | almost 2 years ago | In general, my whole problem with you is in the osm rules. But you are eager to drag it into a religious and political fight. Even if a building is closed for a long time, it can still be registered in the map. I definitely know the difference between a tent and a building. And my records from Karbala to Najaf were fixed buildings. I have not registered the tents. |
139252965 | almost 2 years ago | LockOnGuy@
|
139252965 | almost 2 years ago | Regarding the electric poles, you were the only one who warned about them, not others. In addition, I recorded their numbers according to the signs that were installed on the poles. You have removed all the lightning rods. You could register the original number with the name tag and the numbers that I registered according to their table with the loc_name tag. But you didn't. Meanwhile, the buildings you call temporary are not tents. They were all buildings. According to Wiki rules, every building and complex can be registered on the map. So your work was illegal. |
139252965 | almost 2 years ago | LockOnGuy
|
139252965 | almost 2 years ago | LockOnGuy
|
139252965 | almost 2 years ago | User LockOnGuy
|
139252965 | almost 2 years ago | User LockOnGuy
|
139252965 | almost 2 years ago | Hello
|
139252965 | about 2 years ago | In the case of this grave, as in similar cases, such registrations have been made in this cemetery and in other areas, and the rules of Wiki did not prohibit the registration of graves, so my registration was correct. Even in the original name, I have registered in Arabic language and Arabic letters. I have included the Persian language in a separate tag. |
139249148 | about 2 years ago | In the previous note, I have explained the reason for the change in grading of this street. If you are still not convinced. Take a closer look there. Also read the traffic grading rules. |