Hi Trevor,
Can you tell me what your source is for this edit? The boundary is now deviating significantly from OS surveyed data around the southern end of Blackfriars Bridge.

Hi, I think this was when I was having connectivity problems at my end. I have no idea how the MK change ended up in this changeset - you are right, it is unconnected to the NL changes. I guess I forgot to start a new changeset when switching focus. I'm not sure what you mean by proposing to delete "it", but as far as I am concerned the specific change to the way you mention is a correct change, but I will recheck it.
Sorry for the botch, and thanks for bringing it to my attention!
Cheers,
Colin

changeset comment seems to refer to a different area completely...

Thanks!

Why are you removing these tags from these premises? Are these buildings now empty?

Please fix it in ALL of these changesets

I think you have spelled Millennium wrong... Can you fix it please?

Hi! I see that this boundary change doesn't take administrative effect until April 2025 so I think your changeset is somewhat premature. I propose to revert the Eastfield boundary to its current line, and update it again in April 2025, when the updated boundary will have its new GSS code. https://edemocracy.northyorks.gov.uk/documents/s33564/Final%20Recommendations%20on%20the%20CGRs%20for%20Harrogate%20and%20Scarborough.pdf

Hi,
Can you please add meaningful changeset comments? See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information. Thanks!

Hi! Can you please remember to use barrier=fence and not boundary=fence? Thanks!

The coastline segments you are removing were surveyed as MHWM by the OS, which is the usual basis for the coastline in OSM. Of course having all tidal rivers as "coastline" is not convenient, but the MHW limits can be easily converted to waterway=river polygons which are likely to be more reliable than any aerial photos. How about reusing the surveyed limits instead of tracing from the aerials?

What was the "issue" with the admin boundary? On the coast it should align with the official mean low water line.

Please use barrier=fence instead of boundary=fence. It's not the boundary of the fence is it?

The status of Sealand is rather controversial. Can you give some more information about your sources? Where does your local knowledge come from?
One other thing, the role of this boundary way in the United Kingdom relation should be "inner" not "outer".

What's the "boundary=hazard" area? Perhaps you could add a description saying why it's dangerous.

Hi! Please make sure to not adjust admin boundaries in this type of edit. It is not unusual for them to meander back and forth across roads and streams, and almost all of the UK admin boundaries in OSM are derived from an authoritative source. I have fixed Ampney St Peter already by resetting it to the official boundaries, but I will be checking other affected areas.

Een product is misschien ooit in een fabriek geproduceerd, maar dat hoeft niet. Een product kan ook iets zijn dat door een winkel wordt verkocht - hun assortiment bestaat uit producten. Ik denkt dat je voor deze wijziging ernaast zit.

Hi Leo, na voltooing van rotonde in de Floraweg heeft lijn 73 zijn eigenlijke route hervat. Zet je de vier route-relaties weer terug? Bedankt!

Risinghurst and Sandhills is an administrative entity (civil parish) and Risinghurst should be put back to admin_centre as that is where the council meetings take place.

Will you revert this changeset as well?