Hi,
Please note that electoral wards should be tagged as boundary=political and have no admin_level. See osm.wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dpolitical for more info.
Also, where a ward boundary coincides with a borough boundary, it's good practice to reuse (parts of) the existing way and nodes.
Good luck with mapping all the wards in London!

Sorry, that was meant for the creator of the relation

Hi,
Please note that electoral wards should be tagged as boundary=political and have no admin_level. See osm.wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dpolitical for more info.
Also, where a ward boundary coincides with a borough boundary, it's good practice to reuse (parts of) the existing way and nodes.
Good luck with mapping all the wards in London!

Hi Brian, please be aware that some of your work around the river Corve appears to have been removed by a new mapper in changeset osm.org/changeset/109539763
Not sure what's going on here exactly....
Regards, Colin

Hi... Should this not have name=Birtley? It seems strange to have a place, a town as well, without a name tag.

Hi.... Any particular reason to delete the Egglestone Abbey place=locality node?

Why did you do this? You have deleted perfectly normal, and correct, data. Please revert this change!

I would suggest the railway=crossing where this byway/road crosses the WCML might not be appropriate here, as the road seems to cross the tracks on a bridge. Railway=crossing is used for level crossings.

It looks like this one is clearly intended to cover the foreshore, extending down to the admin boundary at MLWS. http://www.norfolkcoastaonb.org.uk/content/maps/map-sections.php

If this was me, I apologise and I will fix it up! I have never found any "evidence" (in the broadest sense) whether an AONB, or National Park or similar includes the foreshore or not, so I tend to follow the precedent set by the creator of the protected area. It gives a very inconsistent picture across the UK, but it's not really my area. I wonder if there is some general jurisprudence on this, or if each protected area is determined separately?

Thanks for trying to fix it up. It didn't work very well, unfortunately as the boundary you added back was nowhere near aligned to the official boundary. It's sorted now, but please be more careful with boundaries in future.

Hi... I don't know if you realise what you have done, but you have deleted a large section of the boundary between Brize Norton and Carterton. Can you repair this please? If you need help, let us know here.

Hi... Where did you source the boundaries from for Runcorn and Widnes? They can't be tagged as admin boundaries as there is no admin function at that level - there is no Civil Parish. And the council name should not be given, for the same reason - Halton BC already covers these areas. Can you please sort this out? If you need any help feel free to ask.

My apologies Andre, I see now that you did not introduce the coastline tags here. I will look into benoitdd's changesets in the area.

Hi Andre, maybe you are not aware, but the UK admin boundaries are at low water and the coastline is the high water mark. They can only coincide where there is a vertical wall or cliff. Please don't lock the two together unless you are absolutely certain!

I actively, but informally, maintain all the admin boundaries in GB where I can... If you have any questions on the subject or you come across anything anomalous, please let me know, I'd be happy to help if I can!

FYI: Actually not strictly a typo, but an actual name change... Prior to April 2019 the Civil Parish was formally called Mogerhanger. SI 6004/2019 enacted the name change, bringing the legal name of the parish into line with the more usual spelling.

Please take care with the names of objects. It is normal to capitalise each word, and one of them here actually has a spelling error!

Thanks, but my remark about the changeset comment still stands though.

Yeah, it looks good now! Thanks