OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
162957154 5 months ago

Good edit. :)
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162957154

163025621 5 months ago

This changeset has been reverted. Here on OpenStreetMap, we use access tags to denote a road as private. Deleting removes all data, and when someone sees a road, they will likely readd it without access tags, and they cycle starts over. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
osm.wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate

osm.org/changeset/163550074

163434050 5 months ago

Changeset reviewed as requested. Access should be "private" not "no". Updated.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163434050

107282259 5 months ago

What source did you use for all the addresses? Specially, street names?

161224250 5 months ago

South Hope Chapel Road is not a secondary LINK...

62571691 5 months ago

Before anyone asks... "Peephole Cinema" was a real thing, validated, verified and legit.

66462198 5 months ago

I just want to say, thank you for adding the website.

While it may not exist anymore, it certainly kept my search history clean. haha.

127358996 5 months ago

Gate #s should be added to ref=* not name=* on the jetways.

corrected

162489266 5 months ago

Please put the unit numbers in the correct field:

addr:unit=*

162526238 6 months ago

Updates to comply with

osm.wiki/Key:was:*

162468087 6 months ago

Why did you change the name of the realtor to "u" ?

162329703 6 months ago

Changesets reverted. Private access tags added instead.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162329703

162416531 6 months ago

This C/S resolved a note that was posted after:

osm.org/note/4624691

Thanks for handling the vandalism. :)

158722371 6 months ago

Gazebos should not be named.

A name is only a name.

Read more here:
osm.wiki/Key:name#:~:text=language.%5B2%5D-,When%20not%20to%20use,-Do%20not%20use

146343858 6 months ago

Do not tag large water bodies as golf hazards. They are creeks, rivers, etc. not water hazards

146340532 6 months ago

Why would you not add the cartpath bridges over the water? Seems like an odd thing not to map with all the other details.

Also, do not "lollipop" areas to simulate holes.

117335782 6 months ago

Tennis courts are not buildings.

Golf vandalism reverted.

149075231 6 months ago

Good question. Just something I threw in there. There may be a few other editors have used the hastag. Nothing organized by any stretch of the imagination. Haha

I was hoping it would be a way to motivate editors to try and cleanup some of the golf vandalism / improper mapping.

161968512 6 months ago

Google is not an acceptable source!

osm.org/note/4608489

162176323 6 months ago

Can I ask what source you are using?