CycleStreets's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by CycleStreets
Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4315808 | CycleStreets | A cycleway was added but the number of lanes for cars seems to have stayed the same. Are there really still 3 car lanes here? lanes does not include cycle lanes:
|
|||
4288448 | CycleStreets | Is this path really bicycle=no? There's a segregated tag on it and it looks like it is part of the cycleways in the area. |
|||
4003514 | CycleStreets | We understand there is cycle parking in this approximate area but cannot see this from the aerial imagery. |
|||
2751032 | CycleStreets | What is the speed limit of the A470? |
|||
4003577 | CycleStreets | We understand there is cycle parking (4) in this general area but have been unable to locate it from the available imagery. |
|||
4003575 | CycleStreets | We understand there is cycle parking in this general area but have been unable to locate it from the available imagery. |
|||
2553985 | CycleStreets | Are either of these paths legally usable by cyclists, or are they foot only? (I have no evidence that they are - I just wanted to check whether such a shortcut is usable by cyclists or not.) |
|||
2696265 | CycleStreets | Is this gate access private? |
|||
2696268 | CycleStreets | Should this gate be access=private? |
|||
4210393 | CycleStreets | We understand this track is now a dedicated cycle track, but it is currently shown as shared use. If pedestrians are not using the cycle track but are expected to go on a separate pavement, this should be tagged as cycleway=track, foot=no, and there should be either a separate footway added, or sidewalk=left. |