OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

CycleStreets's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by CycleStreets

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
4315808 CycleStreets

A cycleway was added but the number of lanes for cars seems to have stayed the same. Are there really still 3 car lanes here?

osm.wiki/Key:lanes

lanes does not include cycle lanes:
'Count excludes cycle lanes and motorcycle lanes that do not permit a motor vehicle.'

4288448 CycleStreets

Is this path really bicycle=no? There's a segregated tag on it and it looks like it is part of the cycleways in the area.

4003514 CycleStreets

We understand there is cycle parking in this approximate area but cannot see this from the aerial imagery.

2751032 CycleStreets

What is the speed limit of the A470?

4003577 CycleStreets

We understand there is cycle parking (4) in this general area but have been unable to locate it from the available imagery.

4003575 CycleStreets

We understand there is cycle parking in this general area but have been unable to locate it from the available imagery.

2553985 CycleStreets

Are either of these paths legally usable by cyclists, or are they foot only?

(I have no evidence that they are - I just wanted to check whether such a shortcut is usable by cyclists or not.)

2696265 CycleStreets

Is this gate access private?

2696268 CycleStreets

Should this gate be access=private?

4210393 CycleStreets

We understand this track is now a dedicated cycle track, but it is currently shown as shared use.

If pedestrians are not using the cycle track but are expected to go on a separate pavement, this should be tagged as cycleway=track, foot=no, and there should be either a separate footway added, or sidewalk=left.