DUGA's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
39382873 | over 4 years ago | Would you please take a look at osm.org/way/83129943.It is a mysterious line now. |
82429691 | over 4 years ago | You caused more trouble because an illegal turn was added. |
16518643 | over 4 years ago | May I ask what is the point of this relation? Any benefits to the map? |
97788302 | over 4 years ago | Please avoid using Bing in VA (and probably other states as well). Use VA Imagery Service + NAIP instead especially when you map natural features. |
98133184 | over 4 years ago | Hello, can we talk in Slack? I'm very confused with the changeset interface and I could not figure out which one you mentioned with issue. |
79344909 | over 4 years ago | I don't quite understand the point adding this track road especially the junction is only few feet away. Some people may use it to plow the field but you did not tag anything. 38.52038, -76.60473 I'm inclined to a removal though. |
43896682 | over 4 years ago | Key "tiger" is not for mapping useless garbages on the tree. It is a specific key for US TIGER import. If you could not give a better reason, I'd go ahead and delete this key and probably along with all others. |
22261744 | over 4 years ago | Not a foot path. 40.14075, -76.64227 |
60387687 | over 4 years ago | I don't quite understand why directly connecting a foot path to a road only for vehicles, whereas the sidewalk which should be mapped is unfortunately missing. I've reverted the changes and done some enhancements. |
87867511 | over 4 years ago | Just a note: Do not copy paste information from Google. |
11437361 | over 4 years ago | Please do not add unmarked foot path across railroad. It is very dangerous! I've deleted that segment you added near 40.50166, -78.40996. Moreover, the no trespassing sign has been there for years! |
89824767 | over 4 years ago | mast:type should not be used. |
56234023 | over 4 years ago | junction=yes should not be used. |
87298905 | over 4 years ago | I haven't check all your contributions thoroughly, but the one I mentioned is at "40.43205, -75.32959" |
87298905 | over 4 years ago | The mast should never added here. First, this is not a mast. Second, the ATT antennas are deployed on top of the water tower. Although currently there is no collective agreement for how to tag antenna on transmission line or water tower/tank, it is definitely a bad idea to separate it out. Also please be aware of the imagery offset. |
6944375 | over 4 years ago | Any old route number should never be included as main name. |
39714351 | over 4 years ago | The quality of added houses is pretty bad, do you have any sources? |
90210369 | over 4 years ago | Hello, Please read this page before you start any edit in the future: osm.wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_describe_things_using_name_tag Thanks. |
82591830 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Please do not duplicate segments. |
94993242 | over 4 years ago | Martin Constantino–Bodin +1. I'm not sure what caused this but it is very confusing. |