OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
39382873 over 4 years ago

Would you please take a look at osm.org/way/83129943.It is a mysterious line now.

82429691 over 4 years ago

You caused more trouble because an illegal turn was added.

16518643 over 4 years ago

May I ask what is the point of this relation? Any benefits to the map?

97788302 over 4 years ago

Please avoid using Bing in VA (and probably other states as well). Use VA Imagery Service + NAIP instead especially when you map natural features.

98133184 over 4 years ago

Hello, can we talk in Slack? I'm very confused with the changeset interface and I could not figure out which one you mentioned with issue.

79344909 over 4 years ago

I don't quite understand the point adding this track road especially the junction is only few feet away. Some people may use it to plow the field but you did not tag anything. 38.52038, -76.60473

I'm inclined to a removal though.

43896682 over 4 years ago

Key "tiger" is not for mapping useless garbages on the tree. It is a specific key for US TIGER import. If you could not give a better reason, I'd go ahead and delete this key and probably along with all others.

22261744 over 4 years ago

Not a foot path. 40.14075, -76.64227

60387687 over 4 years ago

I don't quite understand why directly connecting a foot path to a road only for vehicles, whereas the sidewalk which should be mapped is unfortunately missing. I've reverted the changes and done some enhancements.

87867511 over 4 years ago

Just a note: Do not copy paste information from Google.

11437361 over 4 years ago

Please do not add unmarked foot path across railroad. It is very dangerous! I've deleted that segment you added near 40.50166, -78.40996.

Moreover, the no trespassing sign has been there for years!

89824767 over 4 years ago

mast:type should not be used.

56234023 over 4 years ago

junction=yes should not be used.

87298905 over 4 years ago

I haven't check all your contributions thoroughly, but the one I mentioned is at "40.43205, -75.32959"

87298905 over 4 years ago

The mast should never added here. First, this is not a mast. Second, the ATT antennas are deployed on top of the water tower. Although currently there is no collective agreement for how to tag antenna on transmission line or water tower/tank, it is definitely a bad idea to separate it out. Also please be aware of the imagery offset.

6944375 over 4 years ago

Any old route number should never be included as main name.

39714351 over 4 years ago

The quality of added houses is pretty bad, do you have any sources?

90210369 over 4 years ago

Hello,

Please read this page before you start any edit in the future:

osm.wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_describe_things_using_name_tag

Thanks.

82591830 over 4 years ago

Hi,

Please do not duplicate segments.

94993242 over 4 years ago

Martin Constantino–Bodin +1.

I'm not sure what caused this but it is very confusing.