OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
37097704 over 9 years ago

Hi Malcolm
tagging waterway=riverbank is now not the preferred way to tag:

osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details

Using natural=water, water=* allows data users to more easily determine whether it's a river, canal, lake etc.

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-February/016422.html

36962708 over 9 years ago

What was the mistake?
Why have you deleted the religion tag?

36940576 over 9 years ago

The link to gave ot the install page is incomprehensible gobbledygook. How anyone is meant to decipher is byond me. Typical of so many OSM wiki help pages.

Did you know about these addition from the carto forum discussion?

36940576 over 9 years ago

You serious expect users to set up their own carto just to see why it isn't working properly? Please get Sandbox to render the test database.

36824880 over 9 years ago

Presuming the road does have weight restriction signage, of course.

36824880 over 9 years ago

Hi CDPC

Welcome to OSM

If this road is unsuitable for HGVs could you please tagged these roads (& any others in the vicinity) as per this widely used tag:
osm.wiki/Key:maxweight

Thanks Dave F.

36785564 over 9 years ago

Hi Richard
Have the lines down Merchant's Way been newly uncovered?

Has there been some major work on the dockside?

36624753 over 9 years ago

Hi again. The area you've tagged as pedestrian is a part of a residential multipolygon relation & doesn't require any additional tags.

Are you sure an access road to a car park is tertiary?

35556511 over 9 years ago

Thanks for doing that.

35484636 over 9 years ago

Sorry, but I'm not willing to do that.

People who make substantial errors should clear it up their own errors. I learnt how to use the JOSM revert tool for precisely that reason. With over 2000 edits you should be able to do the same:
osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

Please be aware Aerial photography is *always* history. If the map doesn't correspond with the images it's usually due to the images being out of date. it should always be treated with caution & further checks should be made, preferable by surveying on the ground.

I look forward to seeing these roads amended to how they were accurately mapped previously.

Cheers
Dave F.

35484636 over 9 years ago

http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/sites/default/files/widcombe_parade_revised_scheme_plan.pdf

35484636 over 9 years ago

Can you revert this changeset please. There's a new road layout that's been accurately mapped. Thanks

35285099 over 9 years ago

Hi
Unfortunately it's rendered under the street name, but in iD if you hover your pointer over the street it disappears & you can see the node.
Cheers
Dave F.

12843284 over 9 years ago

Hi Could you provide the specific way(s) please. You've edited quite a few & it's difficult to determine which one you're talking about.

Cheers
Dave F.

35285099 over 9 years ago

Hi The bollard is already mapped.

34549392 almost 10 years ago

Hi jonkellas
Welcome to OSM.
You appear to have move the bike parking inside a building, Is there a reason this? You've appear to have erroneously put a kink in Wine St. Could you please check & amend in necessary.

34530364 almost 10 years ago

Please stop making erroneous edits

34478739 almost 10 years ago

Hi albryant1

Can you explain the reason for your deletion of this way please:

Cheers
Dave F.

34495446 almost 10 years ago

Hi RFaith
osm.org/changeset/34495446

Please change the background in iD to 'OS OpenData StreetView' to see the true name of the road. Note wood name also.

Cheers
Dave F.

34325458 almost 10 years ago

As you are making no valid edits, could you please refrain from splitting ways. If & when you have maxheadroom please follow the guidelines here: osm.wiki/Key:maxheight