OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
35823466 about 4 years ago

Hi, I will inbox you - sorry I am so useless at getting back to these things

35823466 over 4 years ago

The footpath at Shanliss Avenue, just south of the ADLI site does not connect as you drew it. It never did as there is a rectangle of grass where you placed it. I was there an hour ago, and it would be my opinion that you should review these footpaths with the latest staellite imagery. Better still avoid drawing out footpaths as a unique geomettry, save for where they deviate from the highway. In all cases where they are parallel to the highway they can be easily added, inlcuding every detail about their surface to the highway attributes

32562644 over 4 years ago

Not sure about the field boundary in here, other hedges are visible and not mapped but will leave for you to review

9043552 over 4 years ago

Hello - you drew a service road with private access going through a garden and 2 walls east west and touching Ellenfield Park. This bears no relation to all sources. Was there a path there long ago?

65429126 over 4 years ago

I didn't notice construction on the site, probably because I am local to there

5250008 over 4 years ago

At the R139 to the east of the M50-M1 junction there is a lot of waste ground, but it isn't grass. I have changed the shape of it and redefined it as scrub and woods. There used to be a wild woods here prior to the development of the area and what I have mapped are its remnants

65429126 over 4 years ago

This building is no longer there

66641015 over 4 years ago

Along Magenta Crescent going into Burnside - I have seen the power box. The tagging "location"="kiosk" is suggested as "deprecated by the JOSM validator. Any alternative ideas?

59901845 over 4 years ago

Hi @RathcooleRambler on High street you a number of buildings with points of interest at ground level which may need to be divided. Are the upper floors associated with the ground floors?

71307712 over 4 years ago

Hiya - hope you come back soon!
What I found was mainly just two very different shades on the roof (in imperfect Bing imagery) but I could still see the building outline and it was for a few of them. Look at Adare now, we brought it right up to date. All the same your nodes were important benchmarks to understand how previous imagery lined up

71307712 over 4 years ago

Hi There, The light played a trick on you, the SW half of a roof must have caught the sun, but other clues definitely show a larger roof and building, I wont deleted what you did, but I will edit it into the right place. We are now working on Adare on https://tasks.openstreetmap.ie/project/72

14020148 over 4 years ago

There are a clutch of fields with hedgerow boundaries, some of the fields are pastures and some appear to be barley/wheat fields with the crop just removed. I doubt natural=scrub is the right tag for this, the area isn't natural as a parent and isn't scrub in value. Will change.

85978025 over 4 years ago

@VictorIE can you tell me if this really is a castle - looks to be a house to me

57870194 over 4 years ago

I think drawing landuses which are associated with a private property holding (landuse=residential) becomes problematic when you snap the boundary of that landuse to a road centre line from several points of view. First it implies that the landuse extends out to the middle of the road, which it doesn't, and in this case would have a hedge and a parallel ditch, and the landuse should have been left back about 2 metres from where it is positioned. Add in the fact that the townlands are also part of this method of line drawing we have a number of issues. Any realignment of the road or townland mess this up, as the ways are connected. The roadway is loaded with unnecessary junction nodes, which if repeated at scale will complicate the geometry for routers and add in redundant co-ordinates. I have altered this in three cases in this area. If you can please avoid node pile ups where they don't actually co-incided in ground truth

379683 over 4 years ago

At Ballymadun you drew the local road and the interconnector co-inciding. JOSM didn't like this at all. Did you mean to draw it underground, or maybe it goes along a ditch/trench I see for parts of that road, i.e. by the wayside

51387045 over 4 years ago

Nope, I rarely delete stuff unless I think its vandalism. Sorry the location I refer to is Kilbarrack Road osm.org/changeset/51387045#map=19/53.38942/-6.15259

51387045 over 4 years ago

On Grange road, beside the fence of Naomh Barrog you mapped a few metres of footpath. It seems the community have decided against mapping footpaths as separate ways.

43673653 over 4 years ago

The source can't be Bing sat from 2018 as the tile was the same - also this feature is not on the available older maps

55628898 over 4 years ago

Hello
Do you want some guidance on how to trace and split terraced buildings? There are a number of efforts to the east of Raymond Street in this changeset that I cannot understand how you drew.

28172279 almost 5 years ago

I thought it would be something like that, ok - thanks for the info. Please review my corrections if you know the area well.