JOSM is fussing over a suspicious tag combination at Sherrard Court. I think maybe that it is the speed limit applied to an area. I can't think of anything else

A building, not a landuse

I wish you bagged the number at the end of this interpolation. I am making a guess at it

I know this was a long time ago, but you can make buildings square (orthogonalisation) by pressing Q in JOSM or S inID editor. Have a look at how I have improved the accuracy of the building shapes around here and maybe you can do more of this town :)

Whatever way you get them keep em coming, the Mapillary here was patchy.

Really useful to have these interpolations scattered around. It will be a good basis for a ground survey

What is this object? There is no apartment at this location, or in this area....

Maybe you know what does this, "the way contains a segment twice"

That's done, you could have done it too as all I did was follow the surface on the Bing imagery. It doesn't connect to anything on the NE point because it is most likely an internal track/road on a farm.

The shopping centre car park seems to be drawn twice here. There are a number of issues, one version incorporates a service/loading yard on the west of the building. Other things I would point out is that the car park is drawn as a connected feature to the building, but on the ground it doesn't as there is a walkway gap

Sorted, thanks for the heads up

The house numbering here (579 Howth Road onwards) is discontinuous, which needs a review and splitting which may cure the issues. Several of the houses drawn as attached are not attached. I will be back in a couple of days to start fixing it.

The construction site on the top left corner of this changeset is now fully built out and landscaped. Buildings visible on the 2019 Bing release. I have deleted the construction landuse

About the fixme on the western extent of Ardan road - I went with 6. This is guesswork, but more realistic as the extensions aren't the same size.

As you are adding driveways I suggest you don't join these ways to buildings. There are very few instances where these two realities would co-incide (exceptions being car ports, and archways. I have never seen driveways joined by node to the front of the house. You also absolutely need to specify that driveways are private access where they are a residential building.

The previous convenience shop at the corner of St Anne's Road is now in use as an estate agent, and is no longer vacant. The correct way to tag vacant buildings is building=*, vacant=yes. If the building looked vacant a long time and was boarded up we elevate to disused=yes. Also the point of interest had the name/category error. A way to avoid this is to use note=* and write in a few details for yourself or another mapper to return to, in order to fix the tags

Lower right corner of this changeset - see St Joseph's Avenue on the area behind the Arts Centre is this actually landuse=grass? There doesn't seem to be visual evidence for that.

From my visit here recently I saw kissing gates, not bollards. As they are a tricky arrangement in a tunnel under the house I deleted the original and re-added them.

In general placing gardens right up against building ways is not recommended. These polygons are picked up as overlapping. I have a lot of errors to fix with the buildings in this area, now I have to move or delete these gardens to do it

Hi again Wiktoria - I know you map around here. Do you know if this building is something like a nursing home, or a care home for special needs?