Along Magenta Crescent going into Burnside - I have seen the power box. The tagging "location"="kiosk" is suggested as "deprecated by the JOSM validator. Any alternative ideas?

Hi @RathcooleRambler on High street you a number of buildings with points of interest at ground level which may need to be divided. Are the upper floors associated with the ground floors?

Hiya - hope you come back soon!
What I found was mainly just two very different shades on the roof (in imperfect Bing imagery) but I could still see the building outline and it was for a few of them. Look at Adare now, we brought it right up to date. All the same your nodes were important benchmarks to understand how previous imagery lined up

Hi There, The light played a trick on you, the SW half of a roof must have caught the sun, but other clues definitely show a larger roof and building, I wont deleted what you did, but I will edit it into the right place. We are now working on Adare on https://tasks.openstreetmap.ie/project/72

There are a clutch of fields with hedgerow boundaries, some of the fields are pastures and some appear to be barley/wheat fields with the crop just removed. I doubt natural=scrub is the right tag for this, the area isn't natural as a parent and isn't scrub in value. Will change.

@VictorIE can you tell me if this really is a castle - looks to be a house to me

I think drawing landuses which are associated with a private property holding (landuse=residential) becomes problematic when you snap the boundary of that landuse to a road centre line from several points of view. First it implies that the landuse extends out to the middle of the road, which it doesn't, and in this case would have a hedge and a parallel ditch, and the landuse should have been left back about 2 metres from where it is positioned. Add in the fact that the townlands are also part of this method of line drawing we have a number of issues. Any realignment of the road or townland mess this up, as the ways are connected. The roadway is loaded with unnecessary junction nodes, which if repeated at scale will complicate the geometry for routers and add in redundant co-ordinates. I have altered this in three cases in this area. If you can please avoid node pile ups where they don't actually co-incided in ground truth

At Ballymadun you drew the local road and the interconnector co-inciding. JOSM didn't like this at all. Did you mean to draw it underground, or maybe it goes along a ditch/trench I see for parts of that road, i.e. by the wayside

Nope, I rarely delete stuff unless I think its vandalism. Sorry the location I refer to is Kilbarrack Road osm.org/changeset/51387045#map=19/53.38942/-6.15259

On Grange road, beside the fence of Naomh Barrog you mapped a few metres of footpath. It seems the community have decided against mapping footpaths as separate ways.

The source can't be Bing sat from 2018 as the tile was the same - also this feature is not on the available older maps

Hello
Do you want some guidance on how to trace and split terraced buildings? There are a number of efforts to the east of Raymond Street in this changeset that I cannot understand how you drew.

I thought it would be something like that, ok - thanks for the info. Please review my corrections if you know the area well.

These buildings are off their position and could be 25% of the actual size. As you certainly had good Bing imagery in 2015 what was the thinking on placing buildings this way?

The buildings here are all numbered 93, and neither represent size, shape or number of what I see in the satellite imagery. Maybe a quick review, assuming the area may have changed would be worth it.

@VictorIE my mistake. Maybe other contributors will know

The houses here are about 1/3 the size they need to be.

@᚛ᚏᚒᚐᚔᚏᚔᚋ᚜ 🏳️‍🌈 What is going on here? It doesn't seem to me that there are 6 houses on that terrace to the west of Coolgraney Avenue.

Is this a mistaken node?

Sorted out now