Why did you change a lot of highway=cycleway to highway=path here? For example way 986773526.

Sure!

Thanks! That does seem quite tedious.

Just curious, where'd you get the data for Plymouth Township? Don't see that info on your userpage.

I appreciate your edits here! However, I'm not sure where you're getting this data; you don't cite any source, and I'm pretty sure some of the speed limits you put are incorrect. I recently surveyed 1st Avenue South and the speed limit there is 25 mph, not 20 mph; the speed limit map published by the city (https://www.minneapolismn.gov/government/programs-initiatives/visionzero/speed-limits/speed-limit-map/) also shows this.

Ah, I see. I'm not sure if it's really beneficial to suppress the display of the shields, or if that's worth splitting these into discontinuous relations (feels like it's tagging for the renderer in a way? ideally the renderer would see from the tags on the ways that these designations are unsigned and would not render the shields of that is preferred), but this isn't something I feel *too* strongly about.

What is the benefit from splitting these relations in this case?

Forgot that I had an unsaved change here upgrading a tag on WISD. Didn't mean for that to be in this changeset, but that should be a fairly non-controversial change, so not reverting. Sorry though!

I just realized you're a new editor, so sorry if this came off as harsh. I appreciate your changes! Abandoned railways are a weird thing to be mapped in OSM in the first place, so it's understandable that how they should be treated could cause some confusion.

I'm a bit confused as to why you made this change? This abandoned railway wasn't ever called the Border-to-Border trail when it was in service, and while parts of its right-of-way are used for the Border-to-Border trail, that is already mapped. Therefore the name seems inappropriate to me.

Apologies for the late reply and the error. I wasn't particularly familiar with how relations worked so I can see how I would've made such a mistake; my "due diligence" was more referring to making sure I was reflecting on-the-ground reality correctly with my edits. Thank you for correcting this error!

I know this comment is years after you made this edit, so no worries if you don't remember, but are you sure there's a speed camera here? As far as I'm aware speed cameras are not allowed under Michigan law.

My comment was truncated, so posting in full here:

Realign misaligned features along/near Saline Waterworks Road. This is part of a larger cleanup that needs to take place in the Saline area, as most features in the city are misaligned following edits made in 2019/2020. Other than the editor who did this, no other edits before/after show such misalignment, nor does it make sense considering the surrounding area which is not misaligned. Additionally, many roads follow municipal boundaries, and said municipal boundaries were also misaligned by these edits from what they were before. Feel free to contact me if you have more questions about this, but I've done my due diligence to make sure I am improving things here.