This is so cool! I came across this little park on a bike ride and never noticed it before. I'm glad you added it to the map.

Hello there. While looking for a mountain bike relation I mapped some years ago I see that you've changed the route to a hiking route. Why did you do that? The route is a signed, official mountain bike trail and so I added it as such for cyclists to enjoy. Instead of changing route types, please add a copy (if it is indeed a hiking route.)

See osm.org/changeset/78746676 for inspiration

@Atom although your changes were done incorrectly, there is indeed a storm drain tunnel down there. I researched the location and added it to the map in this changeset osm.org/changeset/84785297

Great! yea the connection between the lake goes SW towards the park.

I took a look at the storm drain data and it does not remotely follow this path. I recommend reverting this changeset and adding the storm drain separately.

I'm thinking this would be better added to the map as an underground pipeline or drain

osm.org/changeset/84344838

No problem, here's the latest change if you are interested.

Hello. Bing imagery is very outdated in this area. The parking lot you've mapped here is gone, hence the construction tagging. I've removed these edits and am replacing with some newer building data. Please take a look at the Maxar imagery instead of Bing. Thank you.

Solid work here! I like the way you mapped the baseball diamonds with the sand in the middle too.

Phil, this tower appears to have moved over to this node, can we combine them? osm.org/node/1314471972

Yea unfortunately 340 is built like an expressway and it wouldn't be a pleasurable shoulder to walk along. Plus you'd skip all of the fun little town of Harpers Ferry. I bet people can catch a Lyft/Uber for the connection since it is near civilization.

Nice work! I came back to add to the URL but you've got it. Did you see the recent update? No timeline.

Ryan, welcome to OSM (if no one else has welcomed you to the project.) This edit is your 296th. I found two issues with it that I wanted to point out. One, the name of this big body of water Indian River Bay, not Rehoboth Bay. The naming is well established on USGS Topo maps and on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_River_Bay . Second, the full bay is not a wetland. Please be careful when editing large multipolygon relations like this one. It looks like you inadvertently removed a part of it, which rendered it incomplete and caused it to draw strangely. The second item is fixed. I'll be switching the first item back shortly. Happy Mapping! -Elliott

FYI to anyone looking at this changeset. Mike and I have worked together on bus stop mapping for several years. In this changeset I gathered public bus stop data for MTA from their open data site, converted the bus stop names and attributes to ones that are compatible with OSM, and then supplied them to Mike for upload. Each was reviewed by either of us in person survey (usually by riding the bus line) prior to adding to OSM.

Nice work adding piers along the waterfront. I see this is your 64th edit. Could you add a bit more info to your changeset comments? Rather than "updated info" say what you updated, "mapped piers along back river looking at imagery. KUTGW.

m86: good work on the green space mapping and edits around Bel Air in general. I must object to the use of the recreation_ground tag in this case however. Any park in the USA that is formally called a park and designated as such should have the leisure=park tag. The recreation_ground tag is a british one (OSM is of British origin). In practice in the USA, mappers generally use it to highlight unofficial parks, e.g. school fields, public green parcels, and so on. If the site is a "park" on Harford County's website and on the ground, then I'd call it that in OSM. Read more: osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark osm.wiki/Tag:landuse=recreation%20ground?uselang=en-US

I’m going off what I know now. I still live in Baltimore and work in the county, and am active in the OSM project. You’re welcome to add the recreational fields as recreation_ground all around the county. That’d be great. But edits that increase the number of Pokémon portals will be reverted unless there’s some concrete evidence of a park there, like a photo on Mapillary or a source that we can use in OSM. There are still plenty of parks out there that could be mapped, such as in adjacent Carroll or Harford counties where local mappers aren’t as active. It’s great to see more green on the map as long as it follows the standards set forth in the OSM Wiki or the mailing lists. If you want, send a post to the OSM US talk list to discuss further with others.

That is incorrect. I worked for Baltimore County for many years. The shared fields at schools are operated as recreation grounds. In OSM we have a tag for that. Only parks on the master park list should appear as parks on OSM. When I worked for BaCo we added all county parks in that list and set Dept of Education Rec center lands to recreation_ground. Please do not alter those tags without consulting with other mappers first.