This changeset has been reversed by the author in osm.org/changeset/110478409 thus fixing the issue. Thanks!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109952343

looks good. I've added bollard to further delineate this. Have a look as an example. These are useful things to add for bike/ped routability

This edit looks generally good. The one feedback I'd have is to make it so that the greenway lanes are added as a tag on the street, rather than a separate way, just like with Lake Street
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109952138

Here is an example of how the data looks when complete: osm.org/way/914122739
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110474952

Is this a regular road that has bike lanes on either side? The way to do that is to add the cycleway=lane tag as an *additional* attribute to the roadway tags. So in this case, you wouldn't want to change the residential tag of the road, just add that there are bicycle lanes. In ID editor, you hit the "add field" area and choose Bike Lanes. Then choose if there is a left, right, or both-sides lane.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110474952

One question I have is if this is indeed a bridge and part of the network: osm.org/note/2828393

Thanks again. Alright, this one is updated. I split it up so that the crossings have the right tags and, as a bonus, added it as a cycle route which will enhance how it shows up on sites that use OSM cycle route data: osm.org/relation/13148453

Got it. I will leave the bridge since it will open very soon. Does it have a real name or designation yet?

also, further down the riverwalk, where it goes under division, it looks like the riverwalk is just along the water, and the roadway goes overhead. no tunnel per se, is that right?

Thanks! At the Mill Street intersection, two questions: Is that ped bridge online yet? And, does the riverwalk require going across Main, across Mill, and back across Main (in a big U) or can they cross direct across Mill?

Tell me a little more about this Riverwalk. It is a paved path along the water, right? Like a promenade? And it is signed for bike/ped access?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109950611

Looks good!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110474165

Added this back

osm.org/way/977933839

osm.org/way/977933838

Thank you. I have added the sections where it is a regular lane, near Small Street, and a Sharrow over the bridge. I will restore the protected lane per your description here! Have any photos of the facility? I want to get down there and check it out.

OK. Thanks for the response. The way to add this information is not to convert these to marked crossings. That information goes on a separate point, where the crosswalk intersects the street. Can you try and remove the lights again where applicable? You can add highway=stop to the intersection points that are now governed by a stop sign instead.

This changeset looks good generally. I fixed the spelling of a park by removing abbreviations.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109950220

According to the SBY GIS site, the sections along Division St are Sharrow only. Is the website wrong here? https://salisbury.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=c10e82df2db74447a7e997cac0aa2f63

Hello there! Did you happen to see my other comments on some of these changesets? We waited 10 days before starting the rollback process. If this is really installed, and it sounds like it is, that is great, but there is no imagery or other data that can be used to verify this. What side of the roadway is the lane one? is it two way? are pedestrians allowed? There is a method to add these sort of things to OSM, I'd be happy to help with.

This looks good. The waterfront areas added are indeed city owned per https://opendata-salisbury.hub.arcgis.com/apps/city-owned-lands/explore
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109947572

Rolled this back in full by adding the cycleway right on the street osm.org/changeset/110472747
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109947340

This changeset removed a crosswalks and traffic signals where there was no need to do so, and generally undid previous mappers work. There are a few useful edits here but they should be done individually, rather than in a big changeset like this. osm.org/changeset/110472378
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109947187