OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
111213367 almost 4 years ago

Wahoo! Thank you for adding this!! I look forward to riding it one day. Saw it in the news. Have you been across?

110484737 almost 4 years ago

I updated the wiki just now, but I think it will be up for discussion. You can keep using it though osm.wiki/Key:traffic_signals

110484737 almost 4 years ago

Ah, perhaps ID doesn't match the wiki. Good pickup then.

110484737 almost 4 years ago

Yes, the wiki mentions that if it is a specialized signal, you should use one of the other terms. But the default is =signal

90490864 almost 4 years ago

The new MD imagery show this area well. It has the new circle too. Want to update?

111219528 almost 4 years ago

Here is the correct changeset comment osm.org/changeset/111219556#map=14/39.6139/-76.8546

111219528 almost 4 years ago

This changeset was uploaded in error. I meant to upload the changes to Hampstead separate.

110484737 almost 4 years ago

hey DUGA, traffic_signals=traffic_lights is not a known value for traffic lights. Use traffic_signals=signal per osm.wiki/Key:traffic_signals

I will update osm.org/node/102880848

111215561 almost 4 years ago

Wrong changeset name! Should have been: deleted unused way

105517807 almost 4 years ago

deleted

111115160 almost 4 years ago

Thank you for adding these! MDOT SHA is actively using OSM crosswalk data for analysis. We're also working on updating protected bicycle infrastructure like what you've added here, so this is perfect. I've been working on getting this into an OSM challenge for updates here: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/21234

110769754 almost 4 years ago

fixed

107899427 almost 4 years ago

Still closed today though the sidewalk is open. What sort of proprietary sources are we talking about for closures? The local governments maintain their own closure data.

110769754 almost 4 years ago

Looks like I missed the existing node because it was outside of a buffer. I’ll move the one you cited to the center and fix

105230044 almost 4 years ago

Good edit here. Noticed and was going to add this

105628106 almost 4 years ago

saw these path ways today in my (similar) travels :) Nice work adding! When adding footways like this (or any "highway" feature, be sure to connect them to an adjacent highway.

In this case the level1 abstraction level would be to simply connect them to the roads, but since there is a sidewalk there, and a curb blocking wheeled access, you could go deeper if you want and add the sidewalk--or you could add a curb object to indicate there is an obstruction there. Either way, at least connect it to something nearby. That lets routing tools work. Cheers! Elliott

110938331 almost 4 years ago

And downgraded thanks to ID's friendly button for that osm.org/changeset/110942706

110942674 almost 4 years ago

see osm.org/changeset/110938331#map=19/39.39746/-76.56837

110938331 almost 4 years ago

Just reverted osm.org/changeset/110942674

110938331 almost 4 years ago

Oops this was supposed to be a note. It is out of business but OsmAnd seems to have made the edit