ElliottPlack's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
111213367 | almost 4 years ago | Wahoo! Thank you for adding this!! I look forward to riding it one day. Saw it in the news. Have you been across? |
110484737 | almost 4 years ago | I updated the wiki just now, but I think it will be up for discussion. You can keep using it though osm.wiki/Key:traffic_signals |
110484737 | almost 4 years ago | Ah, perhaps ID doesn't match the wiki. Good pickup then. |
110484737 | almost 4 years ago | Yes, the wiki mentions that if it is a specialized signal, you should use one of the other terms. But the default is =signal |
90490864 | almost 4 years ago | The new MD imagery show this area well. It has the new circle too. Want to update? |
111219528 | almost 4 years ago | Here is the correct changeset comment osm.org/changeset/111219556#map=14/39.6139/-76.8546 |
111219528 | almost 4 years ago | This changeset was uploaded in error. I meant to upload the changes to Hampstead separate. |
110484737 | almost 4 years ago | hey DUGA, traffic_signals=traffic_lights is not a known value for traffic lights. Use traffic_signals=signal per osm.wiki/Key:traffic_signals I will update osm.org/node/102880848 |
111215561 | almost 4 years ago | Wrong changeset name! Should have been: deleted unused way |
105517807 | almost 4 years ago | deleted |
111115160 | almost 4 years ago | Thank you for adding these! MDOT SHA is actively using OSM crosswalk data for analysis. We're also working on updating protected bicycle infrastructure like what you've added here, so this is perfect. I've been working on getting this into an OSM challenge for updates here: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/21234 |
110769754 | almost 4 years ago | fixed |
107899427 | almost 4 years ago | Still closed today though the sidewalk is open. What sort of proprietary sources are we talking about for closures? The local governments maintain their own closure data. |
110769754 | almost 4 years ago | Looks like I missed the existing node because it was outside of a buffer. I’ll move the one you cited to the center and fix |
105230044 | almost 4 years ago | Good edit here. Noticed and was going to add this |
105628106 | almost 4 years ago | saw these path ways today in my (similar) travels :) Nice work adding! When adding footways like this (or any "highway" feature, be sure to connect them to an adjacent highway. In this case the level1 abstraction level would be to simply connect them to the roads, but since there is a sidewalk there, and a curb blocking wheeled access, you could go deeper if you want and add the sidewalk--or you could add a curb object to indicate there is an obstruction there. Either way, at least connect it to something nearby. That lets routing tools work. Cheers! Elliott |
110938331 | almost 4 years ago | And downgraded thanks to ID's friendly button for that osm.org/changeset/110942706 |
110942674 | almost 4 years ago | |
110938331 | almost 4 years ago | Just reverted osm.org/changeset/110942674 |
110938331 | almost 4 years ago | Oops this was supposed to be a note. It is out of business but OsmAnd seems to have made the edit |