I see you are into bicycle tagging. Good to see that! Trunks are bike routable by default by most US-based routers about you can add the bicycle=yes/no tags to these trunks for specificity if desired.

Have a look here osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_States_of_America

Hi there, these changes were not errors. The trunk is a roadway classification that is independent of the individual characteristics of the pavement. It is an all or nothing sort of thing. US 222 connects two major routes across a region that lacks a motorway connection, thus it is a trunk road. Have a look at this wiki article before making any other roadway classification changes.

osm.wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance

Thanks!

Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

osm.org/user_blocks/5614

They are blocked now, so I don't expect a reply. Are any of these edits valid? osm.org/user_blocks/5605

I'd say you did a bit for than just update that Burlington ;) Looks good there. There was a troublesome mapper active around here that it looks like you may have cleaned up some bogus stuff.

Hi M86. I'm investigating a mass delete around the location of this changeset. Does this appear normal to you? osm.org/changeset/116388913#map=19/39.43499/-76.27675

Go Steve!! Solid work here.

Hi there, Elliott with OSMF DWG. I hope I can help resolve the issue here but first I am a native English speaker only. Can you both communicate in English? If not, I can find a Swedish speaking DWG member.

osm.org/user_blocks/5607

Thanks for contacting the DWG. I am familiar with this data source and the local area. Taking a look at things I agree that this appears to be an import of the Montgomery County dataset. I've actually working on a proposal for a more wholesale import of the MoCo data but would have conflated addresses and excluded existing features. Therefore I would agree that rolling this back may be the best option.

@jpeterson, please respond here to the comments. We all appreciate efforts to update the map but when using external data, there are some important considerations to make with the formal import process.

-- Elliott
OSMF Data Working Group

also wanted to mention I fixed a lot of the geometries of the roads in Homeland.

Hi there. What was "wrong" with these classifications?

Looks like a solid changeset in my personal opinion. Keep up the good work!

From a DWG perspective, we are interested in this effort and will follow this changeset discussion.
--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

Hi there, please do not modify existing water features this way. This should be set up as a multipolygon, not as a polygon with a random hole.

--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114588717

Hi there again. This is not how to draw a country club. The club boundary should follow the legal boundary of the property, where edges of the homes are, not all the way around the neighborhood. Can you fix this? Take a look at where the edges of the course are if you are unsure where the boundary is.

Hi there, Why add golf tags to these water bodies that aren't near a golf course? Why add buildings where there are none. It is fine to add waterways and building where they exist, but not where they aren't. Adding fake features is considered vandalism, which could result in a full scale roll back of your work. Do you understand?

- Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

Hi there, this lake is not a lateral water hazard, it's just a lake. Why would you edit it this way? This is considered vandalism by the community. Will you roll these changes back?

- Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

- Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

Hi there, please don't make edits like this without describing the purpose of the changeset. This adds a fairway where there isn't a golf course underneath. Why? Have a look at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

and

osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls

Designer,

In this version you deleted some roadways for no apparent reason other than the comment "virginian" on your changeset. Why did you do this? This change will be reverted as it is damaging to the map.

--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114758620