ElliottPlack's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
104254150 | almost 4 years ago | What was the issue? It looks like you've updated it all to trunk, right? According to the (still work in progress) guideline, trunk should connect two regional cities of importance when an interstate freeway is not available. In this case I would extent the Trunk designation all the way up to Salisbury. The physical characteristics of the road don't matter, though the dualized part could be tagged as a motorroad=yes |
111547232 | almost 4 years ago | Some years ago I did a cool run where I ran the length of Cabin John from Clara Barton up towards North Bethesda. That was so fun! Are there some other SVPs with a trail that runs up the spine? |
111547232 | almost 4 years ago | Nice work here. The more tedious effort is merging them, which I am doing via JOSM as I can. |
76850349 | almost 4 years ago | Hi there. This edit deleted a protected area of public land that TPC leases from the government. |
111519150 | almost 4 years ago | Forgot to add MNCPPC as a source |
111221649 | almost 4 years ago | Hi there, was there a reason to modify the columbia pipeline here? |
111297550 | almost 4 years ago | Hi there. the edits to the course here look great, mostly, but there is an issue with way trees are mapped. Trees should be mapped with the natural=tree tag, not natural=wood. The latter is for polygon areas of tree cover, the former for individual trees. Also, I would consider adding the golf paths as single lines, in addition to the area highways. Thanks! |
111213367 | almost 4 years ago | Assuming it is not a shared use path, then the foot=no should be added to the bike path. Routing engines in the USA assume a cycleway allows foot traffic osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_States_of_America |
111213367 | almost 4 years ago | I made some minor tagging tweaks here osm.org/way/931223087#map=17/40.70624/-73.99693 |
111213367 | almost 4 years ago | Since you're not on OSM US slack yet (we're discussing here on #local-newyorkstate) https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CJ4QKU40H/p1631849526014300 |
111213367 | almost 4 years ago | Wahoo! Thank you for adding this!! I look forward to riding it one day. Saw it in the news. Have you been across? |
110484737 | almost 4 years ago | I updated the wiki just now, but I think it will be up for discussion. You can keep using it though osm.wiki/Key:traffic_signals |
110484737 | almost 4 years ago | Ah, perhaps ID doesn't match the wiki. Good pickup then. |
110484737 | almost 4 years ago | Yes, the wiki mentions that if it is a specialized signal, you should use one of the other terms. But the default is =signal |
90490864 | almost 4 years ago | The new MD imagery show this area well. It has the new circle too. Want to update? |
111219528 | almost 4 years ago | Here is the correct changeset comment osm.org/changeset/111219556#map=14/39.6139/-76.8546 |
111219528 | almost 4 years ago | This changeset was uploaded in error. I meant to upload the changes to Hampstead separate. |
110484737 | almost 4 years ago | hey DUGA, traffic_signals=traffic_lights is not a known value for traffic lights. Use traffic_signals=signal per osm.wiki/Key:traffic_signals I will update osm.org/node/102880848 |
111215561 | almost 4 years ago | Wrong changeset name! Should have been: deleted unused way |
105517807 | almost 4 years ago | deleted |