Good point, I think you're right that the second name is that of the relation, edited by someone else not aware of adding those. I'd drop that name and leave it on the route. If you look on OpenCycleMap, you can see the relation clear as day.

Hi, thank you for mapping this. I have done some trail mapping in here but was unsure where the MD Trail runs. Do you know of any good reference maps for it (beyond OSM of course)?

Is that section actually named "Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway Trail / Mason-Dixon Trail" with the slash like that? Sometimes folks get a little over enthusiastic about OSM trail naming (I realize you did not assign the name). osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Hi there, I see you recently surveyed the lower section of the Mason Dixon trail. The bridge towards the lower end is closed for construction, so I'm curious if that should still be a part of the trail.

Fixed it for you: osm.org/changeset/131210571

Hi there, please do not name things with a description. The name is for the name only. You can put the opening date in the opening date tag in the name tag.

—
Elliott Plack
OSMF Data Working Group

Uh huh. This is a street complete edit. Are you familiar with app?

Hi there Trail Runner,

While we all appreciate your dedication to trail mapping, this sort of renaming of the C&O by milepost is a violation of the OSM policy that "Names are Names Only". See below. You need to correct these names immediately, to whatever they were before.

This edit split the path into dozens of unneeded segments to break it up by milepost too. That is unnecessary and adds a lot of clutter to the database, such as for the management of the plethora of relations that use this route.

The more I look at this, the more it looks like a full revert of this and the other C&O changeset may be warranted. Please help me understand what inspired you to name the trail this way and if there are any others that have been named this way.

Thank you,

--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

Yes, there’s a photo of it on the wiki, the one with the giant “NO”

Sent a warning via this block osm.org/user_blocks/6717

Hi there Mykol404. I didn't see an entry for these parking lots in the osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue

Could you provide us with any documentation on this import, e.g., discussions with other mappers, a source dataset, a wiki page, etc.?
--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

Hi there,

Please don’t invent access tags for roads on military bases. This causes problems for data consumers that interpret OSM data. access=military has no definition on the OSM wiki. Private access means that the general public is not allowed. That is certainly the case at NSA / Meade.

Thanks for understanding,

Elliott Plack
OSMF Data Working Group

Hi there, welcome to the OSM project. I see you requested a review. These edits look good at first glance. What inspired you to try your hand at lane editing?

nice work here. Can you take a look at the LL 93 relations? The part up on Warren Road seems to be missing. Not broken by you or in this changeset, just a general note.

Looks good

Nice, I am surprised many of these were not mapped already.

as you may know, some folks are contesting the addition of this sauna. If it is unauthorized, should it be access=yes?

osm.org/node/9960648858

Thanks! This is about the project. It may open this week but I'm relying on others for solid ground survey https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/dot-dte/projects/whiteflintww/index.html

Hi there, this road is still closed/under construction. It is supposed to be opening soon.

Done! osm.org/changeset/130337582