Nice to see some more people adding sidewalks ;)...I've been slowly working on filling them in on the far west side the past few months.

Hi there, I noticed you deleted an enormous quantity of nodes on ways that were boundaries. Is there a particular reason for this? It looks like the relation for the [Vrachanski Balkan Natural Park](osm.org/relation/4272269) is broken too.

Hi, I see you have added a footway with an additional name duplicating the previous way that marks this coastline. If you would like to add a localized name that is used in that language for this island, please add it to the existing way: osm.org/way/244148093. I have removed the duplicate way in the mean time.

Hi: the streets/ways you added have some interesting tags which makes me think you are just importing data from some dataset. Also your source tag indicates you are using a government source for the data.

1) Have you discussed this import at all (especially given the accessory tags being added and the streets do not even have a highway=* tag (e.g. osm.org/way/355396455))?

2) Is this data source even compatible with the OSM license? A quick web search states the data is copyrighted by the city.

No problem! The editor can be a little buggy sometimes. If you have any questions as you explore OSM, don't hesitate to send a message. I'm happy to help out. Best wishes.

Hi there,

Did you mean to delete the buildings that were already mapped when you added the Dog Haus? I was in Pasadena a few months ago and don't recall these buildings being out of date--but there could have been construction since then. Let me know if it was by accident...we can easily restore them. Thanks for your additions to the map!

Happy Mapping, FTA

Is this really a building? It looks like just rocks on satellite imagery.

Hi there,
I was curious as to the source of this data. I noticed some of these ways had very peculiar tags which causes them to not render properly.
Thanks,
FTA

Actually it's the relation's label node, not admin_center. Apologies for the incorrect changeset label.

Hi there, I noticed you've been making a lot of edits, which is great. But, would you mind leaving a changeset comment with the edits that summarizes what you have been doing? That's extremely helpful to other mappers in the area to keep informed. Thanks and Happy Mapping! -FTA

Hi there Medic837! I appreciate all the changes you've added to Carlsbad...there are plenty of things still to be added, and editors in the area seem to be sparse :). One thing I did notice was that you added a historic area for the flume (osm.org/way/284566313). There is actually already an object for it (osm.org/way/188494163); the canal's bridge has the historic=aqueduct tag added to it. Therefore, would you mind if I removed the duplicate area? Thanks and Happy Mapping, FTA (a fellow Carlsbadian)