OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
63978800 almost 7 years ago

Veldig bra. Det er rett. Det eneste er at nå er det to barnehager der. Ett par meter lenger nord, inne i bygget er det en barnehage som heter "marineholmen barnenhage", burde slått de to sammen

36875907 almost 7 years ago

Prøvde å finne noe om denne gravvollen, men klarte ikke finne noe. Har du noen navn eller lenker eller noe jeg kan putte på der?

63848306 almost 7 years ago

The stadium is under construction and is not complete. It was a bit messy after removing the south side of the stadium

63759008 almost 7 years ago

You should tag fjords with natural=bay and bay=fjord. There was a cleanup earlier this year that removed all natural=fjord after discussions on the mailing lists

63522590 almost 7 years ago

Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap

There are a lot of things to mention here so i'll make a list

* service_times is meant for churches, you should use opening hours
* you are not suposed to name roads with anything other than their offical name (kleivås kommandoplass, endeligveien)
* the same goes for buildings. The NAME of the BUILDING is not Endelig Media, endelig media just resides inside it.
* I cannot see a building on the aerial photos here, is this a bunker? If so you should look into osm.wiki/Tag:military%3Dbunker and either disused or historical. It is at least not a building=* as it is meant to be used

You should have a look on osm.wiki/Good_practice for some good practice in OpenStreetMap.

Good mapping!

63109606 almost 7 years ago

He uploaded another one of these changesets today osm.org/changeset/63503727

63158927 almost 7 years ago

ah, yes. This was a mistake. Thanks for removing it

63503727 almost 7 years ago

You really shouldn't put emojis in names, and you should't name buildings and ways that don't have a name.

osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

You should consider removing these names

62444171 almost 7 years ago

Looks like your buildings have a huge offset here. You should use the Norway Orthophoto-imagery. It has negligibly offset

58089236 almost 7 years ago

Jeg slettet noen duplikate bygninger her. Du tegnet inn noen som allerede var tegnet inn.

62221187 almost 7 years ago

Du burde fjere hele noden med legevakten/klinikken og ikke bare navnet. Nå er det omgjort til en legeklinikk uten navn.

51339819 almost 7 years ago

Disse byggene HETER vel ikke NRK. Det er bare NRK som er inni de.
Hvis ikke byggene har et ordentlig navn, burde name=NRK vært flyttet over i feks operator=NRK eller office=* og et passende navn for de ulike avdelingene

61626558 almost 7 years ago

You shouldn't give house names as addresses. The name-tag is reserved for NAMES of things.

Also the name of the park should be the NAME and not a description :-)

61586465 about 7 years ago

This is now mapped as a public path going through something that looks like a private property? You should tag it as access=private or something appropriate. Also the name, im guessing thats not a well known or official name so perhaps loc_name would be more appropriate

61406433 about 7 years ago

Ah! A mistake. I'll remove them. Thanks for noticing and notifying me :-)

60582157 about 7 years ago

FYI, merging address nodes to buildings will result in them getting removed from the building and readded as nodes, when the import is run the next round, ref https://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2017-May/006153.html

60430826 about 7 years ago

The Finnsnes Helsesenter shouldnt be a hospital. A hospital is Haukeland Sykehus or Rikshospitalet. Im guessing its either a doctors office (amenity=doctors) or a large clinic of many disiplines (amenity=clinic) :-)

59655387 about 7 years ago

You shouldnt add foreign names to objects that don't have names in that langugage, ref osm.wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration

59517377 about 7 years ago

Ser ut som huset du tegnet inn her overlapper noen veier.
Du burde enten justere huset eller veiene.
Gitt at ikke veien går gjennom huset, da burde du legge på tunell=building_passage på den biten :-)

59440306 about 7 years ago

What was questionable here?