GOwin's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
49654446 | about 8 years ago | Is this the old home of Paz Marquez-Benitez? |
49455774 | about 8 years ago | It would be nice to leave descriptive notes for change set comments, to help other mappers understand the changes you just made. |
48789923 | about 8 years ago | Hello. Welcome to OSM. Changeset comments are meant to descriptive notes you leave for other mappers, to help them understand better any changes you made to the map. |
49413725 | about 8 years ago | Thanks for the edits! The tag `building=government` is a proposed tag and not as mature as the equivalent `building=public` tag. Also, when inputing phone numbers, make sure they follow the international format +<country_code><access_code><phone_number>. |
49414860 | about 8 years ago | These are secondary / multi-functional shelters, and you're missing the "emergency:" prefix for tags. Please fix. :) Thanks! Also, "evacuation_center=yes" is deprecated. |
49413408 | about 8 years ago | These are secondary / multi-functional shelters, and you're missing the "emergency:" prefix for tags. Please fix. :) Thanks! Also, "evacuation_center=yes" is deprecated. |
49415095 | about 8 years ago | Sir, these are secondary / multi-functional shelters, and you're missing the "emergency:" prefix for tags. please fix. :) Thanks! |
49301039 | about 8 years ago | Thanks for the continued contribution, jmbangate. I don't see why this particular change set comment is any worse than say a blank one. Besides, #osmphcitieschallenge is one of the oldest, active hashtags in PH mapping, largely because of this mapper. |
49324239 | about 8 years ago | Thanks for helping out. We appreciate the help. Also, we received your GitHub comment. |
49088918 | about 8 years ago | Thank you for adding data to OSM. But please, be kind enough to edit them on your computer so they are classified correctly. You're only generically tagging them as shop=computer. |
48987881 | about 8 years ago | Hi there. Kindly do not tag buildings with landuse=residential. If you want to classify how buildings are used, you may, for example change this to `building=house` or `building=residential`, whichever is appropriate for your use case. Landuse tags are meant to be classify large geographic areas, to indicate how humans use the land. Ref: osm.wiki/Key:landuse Kindly revert these changes. If you need help with that you can contact the local OSM community for your concerns, or other details: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph or fb.com/osmph Please feel free to contact us for assistance. |
48988468 | about 8 years ago | typo: `1building=residential` should read as `building=residential` |
48988468 | about 8 years ago | Hi there. Kindly do not tag buildings with landuse=residential. If you want to classify how buildings are used, you may, for example change this to `building=house` or 1building=residential`, whichever is appropriate for your use case. Landuse tags are meant to be classify large geographic areas, to indicate how humans use the land. Ref: osm.wiki/Key:landuse Kindly revert these changes. If you need help with that you can contact the local OSM community for your concerns, ask for assistance, or other details: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph or fb.com/osmph |
48903009 | about 8 years ago | Thanks! I opened a ticket here, and proposed next steps: https://git.io/vHOPC |
48903009 | about 8 years ago | Do you have contact information of the office/department leading this effort? |
48749193 | about 8 years ago | Barangay halls are tagged as amenity=townhall and townhall:type=village. For reference, refer to Philippine mapping conventions: https://goo.gl/kyf0iU |
48616513 | about 8 years ago | Hi Pons. Kamusta na kayo? Nakita niyo na ba yung bagong imagery from DigiGlobe? Sa right sidebar, click on background layer, then select DigiGlobe para makita at ma-compare niyo. |
48355643 | about 8 years ago | Hello there. These are very good contributions to OpenStreetMap. Are you connected with any organization, or is visiting waterfalls one of your past times? |
48182455 | over 8 years ago | @Upendra While using a park tag on a node is not ideal, it's not a good enough reason to delete them. Some users may use a node to temporarily tag a park, when there's no available imagery in the area (i.e., cloud cover). In this case, this person is a new mapper, and I agree with your suggestion that they should add a way to define the boundaries of the park and merge it with this node. |
43369049 | over 8 years ago | Hi there. May I know the source you used for these digitized features? |