OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
60983480 about 7 years ago

When digitizing building, don't forget to square corners, and that none of the nodes intersect with other buildings.
http://imgur.com/Y13c9oVl.png
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60983480

60983997 about 7 years ago

Also noted that features you added were correct, if only they weren't duplicates. Try adding or updating features not yet on the map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60983997

60983997 about 7 years ago

These POIS duplicate features that already exist as polygon areas. You may add new details, but do not duplicate features. They don't add new value to the map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60983997

60989883 about 7 years ago

These row (terraced) houses should be tagged as `building=terrace`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60989883

59804286 about 7 years ago

Over-lapping buildings: http://imgur.com/nBhtOBzl.png

In JOSM, these ought to have been corrected in JOSM vefore uploading.

59726122 about 7 years ago

Many of these digitized buildings are bigger than they're supposed to be, Mikko.

Building outlines should not (or minimize) areas that are not part of the building footprint.

http://imgur.com/hXPGQo6l.png

60943719 about 7 years ago

Hello @Bong Sayno. Thank you for contributions, and helping make a better map of your favorite neighborhood.

I noticed that you've been adding a number of private residences on the map, including their names. Even if you have their permission, it's a good idea to respect the privacy of people. They have been rolled back.

Instead, what you can do is to leave out their names, and perhaps add addresses like house numbers and streets, which are information that's available to the public anyway.

As for the other features you've added, kindly try to classify them correctly so other people can easily find them, instead of mis-tagging them as "tourist attractions."

60927085 about 7 years ago

And those empty nodes appear to have been generated during an earlier mapathon led by your project, mostly by user "ohmyjacjac".

That person appears to have deleted buildings, some of which look geometrically correct, although slightly enlarged, and with some offsets. If they are still part of your mapping team, it might be worthwhile to check their workflow.

By the way, your project still doesn't have the list of mappers working in your effort:
osm.wiki/Philippines/PRCVCAD_Project

60870793 about 7 years ago

That's good to know. :smile:

However, I couldn't really imagine how that would happen with a frozen PC. Could you elaborate?

60901576 about 7 years ago

Thank you for your contributions. Please check again, and make sure that you don't forget to "square" the buildings corners
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60901576

60866022 about 7 years ago

This appears to be two buildings that are better traced separately. In addition, you may tag the area as landuse=residential name=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60866022

60868316 about 7 years ago

This is awesome! Thank you for adding details and helping improve the map of your favorite neighborhood.

If you wish to keep in touch with local mappers, there are a number of community channels you can try: https://telegra.ph/OpenStreetMap-LoCo-channels-in-the-Philippines-02-15
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60868316

60870002 about 7 years ago

This is awesome! Thank you for adding details and helping improve the map of your favorite neighborhood.

Kindly add useful changeset comments that describes the edits, to help other mappers. Don't jut add a hashtag.

If you wish to keep in touch with local mappers, there are a number of community channels you can try: https://telegra.ph/OpenStreetMap-LoCo-channels-in-the-Philippines-02-15
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60870002

60870965 about 7 years ago

Kindly don't duplicate features that are already mapped, like this road, F. Calderon.

If you like to add or improve the details, simply edit the existing feature.

60871075 about 7 years ago

Kindly don't duplicate roads that are already mapped.

60870793 about 7 years ago

Kindly don't duplicate roads that are already mapped.

60876349 about 7 years ago

re Blumentrit Motorcycle parts. I mean to say that they are not necessary, but as long as you know that the details are accurate, they are great to have.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60876349

60876349 about 7 years ago

This is awesome! Thank you for adding details and helping improve the map of your favorite neighborhood.

The extra tags you added for Blumentrit Motorcycle parts doesn't seem necessary though, so you might want to check tag again. Let me know if you have questions.

If you wish to keep in touch with local mappers, there are a number of community channels you can try: https://telegra.ph/OpenStreetMap-LoCo-channels-in-the-Philippines-02-15
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60876349

60876743 about 7 years ago

Same here. This is probably better as `unclassified` or minor road, rather than secondary.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60876743

60876954 about 7 years ago

This road is probably better tagged as `unclassified` and not secondary. See: https://wiki.som.org/wiki/Key:highway for details.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60876954