In the same changeset, editor appears to add features using multiple imagery sources - but does not factor offsets between imagery.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64281932

Is the editor a validator? Changeset appears to be mostly deletions, but from the imagery appear to be valid edits, although many are incorrectly tagged - buy why delete when they may be corrected instead?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64763083

New road based on outdated Bing imagery and appears to be temporary, as road and building it serves is no longer visible in newer imagery (ESRI, DG, Mapbox)
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64315740

Although, w643248396 was subsequently deleted in c64763083, the original editor appears correct, and Mapillary imagery does show what seems like a service road, albeit incorrectly tagged as residential.

w242719186 tagged as scrub, could also have been deleted, as well.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64391678

Geometry offset errors could've been improved.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63747914

Major offset difference could've been corrected.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63222048

Editor is noted to have deleting existing roads and re-adding the same instead of just improving them - which isn't a good practice. Of course, there are known cases where deleting and adding a road is acceptable, but that isn't even the case here.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64219494

Covered two discontinous areas, which ideally could've been split to two. Edits to the west are okay, but edits to the east removed the valid driveway tag, and changed the previously better geometry. The editor misinterpreted the angle of features in the imagery and the perceived space between features.

Checking other imagery could've avoided this. This is typical for beginners and easily addressable with proper on-boarding.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64222985

good point @frebeer! Will follow-up with DWG.

Hello @Serdeeneil Merin, and welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Thank you for these edits!

Kudos for helping make a better map of your favorite neighborhoods. OSM is a database of real-world features, used by many humanitarian and emergency service organizations. Fictional edits has no place in OSM.

When you have a few minutes to spare, try the browser-based editor called iD, to edit the map of your community. You may find it quicker and easier if you need to update a lot of information on the map.

If you're keen to know more, there's this concise tips page for Philippine contributors: https://telegra.ph/Awesome-OSM-Tips--Tricks-01-28

Also, find out the latest happenings, or interact with local contributors through these community channels: osm.wiki/PH/channels

If you have any questions at all, please feel free to get in touch. You might be doubtful about a particular tag, or would like to clarify their use. Or perhaps, you have ideas you want to flesh out to improve your neighbourhood map. Or maybe just want to know more about OSM.

Cheers,

Hello @marianne. We noticed your recent edits in the Lupang Arendang area, and left earlier comments about your practice of adding names of inhabitants to these dwellings, which goes against the OpenStreetMap policy on private and personal information.

You appear to be the earliest mapper from this group, so I'm directing this message to you, to let you know that all "organized editing" efforts (that means, you and the following users: cyberzeus, Joebertsss, josepgpagatpat, Knowell, and all others who may also be working with you on OSM) is required to create a wiki page to document your work, declare affiliations, and determine who is accountable for your edits.

For more information, kindly refer to the policy document: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/1/13/Organised_editing_guidelines_version_20180908.pdf

If you have questions or other concerns, please feel free to get in touch with the local OpenStreetMap community, or with me directly.

Kind regards,

Hello @Knowell. Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).

It has been noted that personal and private information were added to buildings in this changeset. The freedom to map the world in OSM has limitations where it violates the privacy of people living in this world. For OSM policy details on this matter, refer to osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information.

Names of the inhabitants of these dwellings has been redacted from all your changesets.

If you have questions or concerns, please let me know or reach out the local mapping community: osm.wiki/PH/channels

Cheers,
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65178844

Hello @ceberzeus. Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).

It has been noted that personal and private information were added to buildings in this changeset. The freedom to map the world in OSM has limitations where it violates the privacy of people living in this world. For OSM policy details on this matter, refer to osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information.

Names of the inhabitants of these dwellings has been redacted from all your changesets.

If you have questions or concerns, please let me know or reach out the local mapping community: osm.wiki/PH/channels

Cheers,
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65395149

Hello @joebertsss. Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).

It has been noted that personal and private information were added to buildings in this changeset. The freedom to map the world in OSM has limitations where it violates the privacy of people living in this world. For OSM policy details on this matter, refer to osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information.

Names of the inhabitants of these dwellings has been redacted from all your changesets.

If you have questions or concerns, please let me know or reach out the local mapping community: osm.wiki/PH/channels

Cheers,
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65536709

Hello @josepgpagatpat. Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).

It has been noted that personal and private information were added to buildings in this changeset. The freedom to map the world in OSM has limitations where it violates the privacy of people living in this world. For OSM policy details on this matter, refer to osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information.

Names of the inhabitants of these dwellings has been redacted from all your changesets.

If you have questions or concerns, please let me know or reach out the local mapping community: osm.wiki/PH/channels

Cheers,
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65599133

w400177650, south of this changeset was changed from secondary_link to motorway_link is inaccurate. The original secondary_link should not have been replaced at all, based on traffic direction flow and road connectivity
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62682963

Hello @josepgpagatpat! Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM)

It's been noticed that you've been adding personal information to the features you've been editing on OSM. Kindly refrain from doing so, and roll back the changes you made. Let us know if you need any help with that.

Persona, and private information, has no place in a public database like OSM. You can other information, like housenumbers, streetnames, etc, but not personal information.

Cheers,

Kindly don't duplicate features that are already on the map by adding a second POI node of the same, just so it would render as as icons.

Hello @mataverderonnieASHSCOM

Kindly do not trace over features that already exist. These are best edited, to improve the geometry or attributes.

Thanks That protruding portion does look odd. Would love to know if can have more info.

Thanks for the edits.