OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
64186885 over 6 years ago

Added unnecessary oneway=yes tag on roundabout. Deleted a road segment, then replaced it with a new one.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64186885

64187103 over 6 years ago

Deletion of w283153259, which appears to be a valid feature from the imagery. Other edits in this changeset seems okay.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64187103

64189091 over 6 years ago

Another huge changeset covering edits in Thailand and Panama's coastline!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64189091

64197629 over 6 years ago

Editors should avoid working on huge areas in one changeset - edits in WA, USA and Kedah, MY. Also, described as "editing lanes" but no such lane editing was made in that changeset.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64197629

64216940 over 6 years ago

Added redundant oneway=yes tags on junction=roundabout ways , which are already implied for all such tags: w200605189, w200605190, w200605197
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64216940

64281932 over 6 years ago

In the same changeset, editor appears to add features using multiple imagery sources - but does not factor offsets between imagery.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64281932

64763083 over 6 years ago

Is the editor a validator? Changeset appears to be mostly deletions, but from the imagery appear to be valid edits, although many are incorrectly tagged - buy why delete when they may be corrected instead?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64763083

64315740 over 6 years ago

New road based on outdated Bing imagery and appears to be temporary, as road and building it serves is no longer visible in newer imagery (ESRI, DG, Mapbox)
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64315740

64391678 over 6 years ago

Although, w643248396 was subsequently deleted in c64763083, the original editor appears correct, and Mapillary imagery does show what seems like a service road, albeit incorrectly tagged as residential.

w242719186 tagged as scrub, could also have been deleted, as well.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64391678

63747914 over 6 years ago

Geometry offset errors could've been improved.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63747914

63222048 over 6 years ago

Major offset difference could've been corrected.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63222048

64219494 over 6 years ago

Editor is noted to have deleting existing roads and re-adding the same instead of just improving them - which isn't a good practice. Of course, there are known cases where deleting and adding a road is acceptable, but that isn't even the case here.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64219494

64222985 over 6 years ago

Covered two discontinous areas, which ideally could've been split to two. Edits to the west are okay, but edits to the east removed the valid driveway tag, and changed the previously better geometry. The editor misinterpreted the angle of features in the imagery and the perceived space between features.

Checking other imagery could've avoided this. This is typical for beginners and easily addressable with proper on-boarding.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64222985

65178844 over 6 years ago

good point @frebeer! Will follow-up with DWG.

65626002 over 6 years ago

Hello @Serdeeneil Merin, and welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Thank you for these edits!

Kudos for helping make a better map of your favorite neighborhoods. OSM is a database of real-world features, used by many humanitarian and emergency service organizations. Fictional edits has no place in OSM.

When you have a few minutes to spare, try the browser-based editor called iD, to edit the map of your community. You may find it quicker and easier if you need to update a lot of information on the map.

If you're keen to know more, there's this concise tips page for Philippine contributors: https://telegra.ph/Awesome-OSM-Tips--Tricks-01-28

Also, find out the latest happenings, or interact with local contributors through these community channels: osm.wiki/PH/channels

If you have any questions at all, please feel free to get in touch. You might be doubtful about a particular tag, or would like to clarify their use. Or perhaps, you have ideas you want to flesh out to improve your neighbourhood map. Or maybe just want to know more about OSM.

Cheers,

65433183 over 6 years ago

Hello @marianne. We noticed your recent edits in the Lupang Arendang area, and left earlier comments about your practice of adding names of inhabitants to these dwellings, which goes against the OpenStreetMap policy on private and personal information.

You appear to be the earliest mapper from this group, so I'm directing this message to you, to let you know that all "organized editing" efforts (that means, you and the following users: cyberzeus, Joebertsss, josepgpagatpat, Knowell, and all others who may also be working with you on OSM) is required to create a wiki page to document your work, declare affiliations, and determine who is accountable for your edits.

For more information, kindly refer to the policy document: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/1/13/Organised_editing_guidelines_version_20180908.pdf

If you have questions or other concerns, please feel free to get in touch with the local OpenStreetMap community, or with me directly.

Kind regards,

65178844 over 6 years ago

Hello @Knowell. Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).

It has been noted that personal and private information were added to buildings in this changeset. The freedom to map the world in OSM has limitations where it violates the privacy of people living in this world. For OSM policy details on this matter, refer to osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information.

Names of the inhabitants of these dwellings has been redacted from all your changesets.

If you have questions or concerns, please let me know or reach out the local mapping community: osm.wiki/PH/channels

Cheers,
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65178844

65395149 over 6 years ago

Hello @ceberzeus. Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).

It has been noted that personal and private information were added to buildings in this changeset. The freedom to map the world in OSM has limitations where it violates the privacy of people living in this world. For OSM policy details on this matter, refer to osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information.

Names of the inhabitants of these dwellings has been redacted from all your changesets.

If you have questions or concerns, please let me know or reach out the local mapping community: osm.wiki/PH/channels

Cheers,
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65395149

65536709 over 6 years ago

Hello @joebertsss. Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).

It has been noted that personal and private information were added to buildings in this changeset. The freedom to map the world in OSM has limitations where it violates the privacy of people living in this world. For OSM policy details on this matter, refer to osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information.

Names of the inhabitants of these dwellings has been redacted from all your changesets.

If you have questions or concerns, please let me know or reach out the local mapping community: osm.wiki/PH/channels

Cheers,
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65536709

65599133 over 6 years ago

Hello @josepgpagatpat. Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).

It has been noted that personal and private information were added to buildings in this changeset. The freedom to map the world in OSM has limitations where it violates the privacy of people living in this world. For OSM policy details on this matter, refer to osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information.

Names of the inhabitants of these dwellings has been redacted from all your changesets.

If you have questions or concerns, please let me know or reach out the local mapping community: osm.wiki/PH/channels

Cheers,
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65599133