GOwin's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
65334429 | over 6 years ago | Hi @lorenzo rafael. I noticed you mentioned "prcvcadteam2", may I know the username or contact information of whoever supervises your team?
|
65631376 | over 6 years ago | Hi @lorenzo rafael. Another way of improving the quality of your OpenStreetMap contributions is to square building corners. I noticed that you're using the iD editor, and with this tool , just press the "s" key while a building is selected and the polygon's corners are automatically squared for you (works well with square-ish features. YMMV, but works most of the time.)
|
65829269 | over 6 years ago | Hi @lorenzo rafael. A good practice while working on your favorite neighbourhoods is try to keep the editing area as small as possible, to keep the relevant edits together, and the changeset as small as possible. In this case you edited some features in Nabas, and then jumped to Buruanga - over 22 kilometers away.
|
65833873 | over 6 years ago | Hi @lorenzo rafael. When mapping buildings, kindly try to avoid overlapping them with other features.
|
64252254 | over 6 years ago | Hello @lorenzo rafael Thank you for your edits. I noticed that you're working on VCAD projects, but you're also duplicating existing roads by adding them again. Kindly only add road features whenever they don't exist on the map yet, and simply edit them when they already exist.
Also, find out the latest happenings, or interact with local contributors through these community channels: osm.wiki/PH/channels |
64342947 | over 6 years ago | Great edits, thanks! May I know how you ended up working on this particular task? Is there a local mapping event ? |
64341994 | over 6 years ago | Good job, with your edits. Thank you! |
63744667 | over 6 years ago | Road segment classification changed from secondary_link to motorway_link , misintepreting imagery. Eventually corrected in changeset 65684358
|
63746754 | over 6 years ago | Another case of certain segments being deleted and replaced.
|
63746922 | over 6 years ago | Another case of certain segments being deleted and replaced.
|
63746877 | over 6 years ago | Why delete w636724435 and w636724435, only to have them added back later in a newer changeset?
|
63785350 | over 6 years ago | w637107125 looks like a service road, rather than residential. Other edits look okay.
|
63814868 | over 6 years ago | Another case where part of a segment was deleted, then later re-added as new segment.
|
63815061 | over 6 years ago | w637347194 seems better tagged as service
|
64185771 | over 6 years ago | w641104670 doesn't seem like a road. Other edits look okay.
|
64186885 | over 6 years ago | Added unnecessary oneway=yes tag on roundabout. Deleted a road segment, then replaced it with a new one.
|
64187103 | over 6 years ago | Deletion of w283153259, which appears to be a valid feature from the imagery. Other edits in this changeset seems okay.
|
64189091 | over 6 years ago | Another huge changeset covering edits in Thailand and Panama's coastline!
|
64197629 | over 6 years ago | Editors should avoid working on huge areas in one changeset - edits in WA, USA and Kedah, MY. Also, described as "editing lanes" but no such lane editing was made in that changeset.
|
64216940 | over 6 years ago | Added redundant oneway=yes tags on junction=roundabout ways , which are already implied for all such tags: w200605189, w200605190, w200605197
|