Hello, Great contributions on this area ! I see you are using LiDAR data, are they publicly available ? I would also be interested in it to help mapping. Looking forward to discuss it if you want

Ce changeset a été entièrement annulé par le changeset 119419429.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119418627

Merci d’éviter une guerre d’édition (cf. osm.org/changeset/117080426 + voir osm.wiki/Disputes et https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:Guerre_d’édition )
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119067258

Pour rappel : osm.wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Mappez_ce_qui_se_trouve_sur_le_terrain . Cette cabane a tout à fait sa place sur OpenStreetMap puisqu'elle est visible depuis les images satellites. (Qu’elle soit privée ou non. À la rigueur un tag spécifiant les conditions d'accès pourrait être ajouté si l'information est vérifiable)

Ce changeset a été entièrement annulé par le changeset 118845593.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118836856

Ce changeset a été entièrement annulé par le changeset 117841777.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117840232

Ce changeset a été annulé entièrement ou en partie par le changeset 117749522.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117290815

Ce changeset a été annulé entièrement ou en partie par le changeset 117749476.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117291451

Ce changeset a été annulé entièrement ou en partie par le changeset 117749414.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117731537

Ce changeset a été annulé entièrement ou en partie par le changeset 117749391.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117732057

Bonjour,
La source est bien légale, puisque diffusée sous licence ODbL (données disponibles ici : https://datanova.laposte.fr/explore/dataset/laposte_boiterue/) mais il semble que ce changeset soit un import et non une intégration (aucune adaptation des tags sources). @racjul veuillez corriger ces points, sans quoi ce changeset sera revert. Une intégration manuelle avec Osmose (avec une vérification terrain) est plus adaptée.

Hello,

I notice a lot of objects tagged `hires=*` + `hires:checkdate=*` + `hires:imagery=*` https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eKT . These tags are not documented and do not correspond to mappable objects. What is the point of keeping these geometries now?

Bonjour,

Merci de regrouper vos prochaines modifications dans un changeset plus global (par exemple pour vos contributions de ce weekend, avec un changeset de type 'Annecy : Ajout de passages piétons'). Votre manière de faire rend très difficile tout suivi .

Merci de faire le nécessaire à l'avenir.

Please include a meaningful changeset comment in any future edits you are making. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Congratulations !!

Hi,

Thank you for these additional indications, so you have created this point after reading the note. If I understand correctly, you create points with a tag name=* for each note created in Phnom Penh. Do you check the presence of this object? Or the type of establishment, in which case you could indicate a primary tag (For example for SundaySticker, it could be shop=stationery) This would allow all these points to be searchable on overpass, and better be referenced on nominatim. (osm.wiki/Map_features). I've already done this on a few POIs, and they appear correctly on the Mapnik rendering as well as via Overpass. I suggest that you identify the type of POI indicated in the notes before adding it on OSM (and possibly add other contact tags). I'm always available if you have any questions.

If you want to visualize the different points that would require the addition of a primary tag (making it usable for OSM) you can use this Overpass request : https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/13lH

Have a nice day

Hi andy9876,

First of all thank you for your many contributions to OpenStreetMap, you are a long time and regular contributor and I thank you for that. I noticed many nodes with an orphan name=* attibut (without primary tag), which does not follow the tagging rules (always a primary tag, preferably with an institution name). I am currently updating several of these points on Phnom Penh, but I invite you to pay more attention to this point in the future. Moreover for a better tracking of changes and additions made on Phnom Penh, you should add a comment of changeset, making it easier to read your contributions. I advise you to use Osmose to keep an eye on these omissions, as well as your own: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#username=andi9876&zoom=15&lat=11.53635&lon=104.91492&item=xxxx&level=1,2,3&tags=&fixable=

Have a nice day,
GeoMechain

Hi Elijah Filip,

Why did you remove the landuse=residential tag ? It seems to be appropriate in this case. While the tag area=yes is very vague and not usable. Moreover the description is not understandable.

Moreover this contribution seems to be an import from an external base (which would explain the difficult understanding of the latter). Be aware that there is a special procedure for importing data: osm.wiki/Import

If you have more questions you can contact the community: osm.wiki/Contact_channels.

GeoMechain

I just realized that I didn't specify which way it was. I will rectify this right away: osm.org/way/804845451 .

Hello and thank you for your contribution! The oneway tag is misinformed, could you please tell me if this is a one-way street, and if so, in which direction? You can learn more about this tag on this page of the wiki: osm.wiki/JA:Key:oneway. Thanks again!