#TIP: instead of deleting and re-adding the feature, just move the feature and update tags as needed which save the history of the object.

Question, is SE 12th Street have no trespassing signs or is it just privately owned? If privately owned then use ownership=private. Also, King County iMap appears shows this a owned by the city of North Bend
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169962677

I have reverted the border change. Thanks for getting back to me.

I went ahead and added sport-multi. The area looks like a half court basketball, but I'm not sure about the other markings. If you find out, the correct tagging would be something like sport=basketball;tennis;etc. Just add the games separated by a semicolon.

#TIP: use the tag ownership=private instead of access=private unless the road is marked as no trespassing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169841695

What kind of sport or sports are played on here? Can you add them?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169839110

#TIP: Instead of deleting and then adding the feature back, just adjust the geometry and tags to save the history of a feature
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169835919

DWG here. I was about to revert the previous changeset that moved the border. While I know of the conflict, I'm not knowledgeable of the details. Is this an actual disputed area or should it be reverted back to the previous state?

Looks like you added a waterway=drain to the building. Fortunately someone else removed it.

Also, when adding trees, sometimes it is easier to draw a polygon around a group of trees and tag it as natural=wood.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169698561

#TIP: when a drive through goes under a roof, I usually separate the roof section from the building, then add layer=1 to the building=roof.

The rest of your edits looks great.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169689339

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169675965

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169745915

Do you know if this region is still under dispute between Chile and Argentina? DWG received a report that it has been resolved but with no documentation that it has.

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169536701

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169536636

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - they will look very professionally done
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169533047

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169485230

#TIP: Descriptive names are not used in OSM. Instead, just tagging the feature is sufficient.

Also, from the aerial imagery, this looks like a highway=footpath instead of a path. A path is more like a trail.

Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169474612

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169484707

Do you know if OSM is allowed to use Ferndale's imagery? I'm in Skagit county and know that the imagery can not be used in OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169427509