To make a circle object, just draw a rough circle, then type an "o" and you'll have a perfect circle. Also, water towers are tagged as man_made=water_tower. tagging helps to easily identify objects. Can you update this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159417287

I would be helpful to other users and yourself to add a brief changeset comment when you upload edits. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more help writing changeset comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159392254

same multipolygon issue with Lake Dawn. I fixed this one as an example.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159376803

Because there is a lake in the middle of your woods polygon, the lake rendering is a combination of lake and woods. A better way is to add the lake as an inner polygon to the wooded area. I also notice, not all of the area is wooded, especially just north of the lake. Multipolygons are more difficult so if you need help, you might check out osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon.

Can you review this edit to improve it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159376406

Because there is a lake in the middle of your woods polygon, the lake rendering is a combination of lake and woods. A better way is to add the lake as an inner polygon to the wooded area. I also notice, not all of the area is wooded, especially just north of the lake. Multipolygons are more difficult so if you need help, you might check out osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon.

Can you review this edit to improve it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159376406

Because there is a lake in the middle of your woods polygon, the lake rendering is a combination of lake and woods. A better way is to add the lake as an inner polygon to the wooded area. I also notice, not all of the area is wooded, especially just north of the lake. Multipolygons are more difficult so if you need help, you might check out osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon.

Can you review this edit to improve it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159376406

Please do not remove features unless you know they do not exist anymore.

Glassman
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155702973

Please do not remove buildings that exist.

Glassman
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159355155

According to plugshares terms, sharing of their data is not allowed. See "Use of the Service. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, you are hereby granted a non-exclusive, limited, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, freely revocable license to use the Service for your personal, noncommercial use only and as permitted by the features of the Service. Company reserves all rights not expressly granted herein in the Service and the Company Content (as defined below). Company may terminate this license at any time for any reason or no reason." Can you verify that you are aware of this ev charging station and it's capabilities? If not then this node should be removed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159352747

According to plugshares terms, sharing of their data is not allowed. See "Use of the Service. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, you are hereby granted a non-exclusive, limited, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, freely revocable license to use the Service for your personal, noncommercial use only and as permitted by the features of the Service. Company reserves all rights not expressly granted herein in the Service and the Company Content (as defined below). Company may terminate this license at any time for any reason or no reason." Can you verify that you are aware of this ev charging station and it's capabilities? If not then this node should be removed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159352747

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159352429

Thanks for the info and look forward to seeing the completed project mapped in OSM

I don't know if it was wrong, I was just surprised at the size of the changeset bbox.

Why did you include a service street in Oregon with this change in Germany?

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

again it looks like to added a feature inside of another. In this case a building inside of an existing building. Please correct.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159230421

#TIP: please square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q".

The top building you have as layer -1, which means it's below ground. I think you meant layer=1 then you would also want to change it to building=roof. These are often found in covered gas pump locations.

The bottom building layer=1 is unnecessary.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159230404

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You duplicated the already mapped Hickman Park. Pleaase fix.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159230357

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

It looks like you duplicated the cemetery. Can you fix this?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159230309

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159230296

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159225685