Glassman's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
161578700 | 7 months ago | Shouldn't this area just be named Evergreen State College?
|
161584453 | 7 months ago | I'm reverting this changeset. Please consult with the community before renaming Mount Denali. |
161573265 | 7 months ago | The alt_name should also be reverted. Happy to do so |
161508930 | 7 months ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. You accidentally dragged nodes of ways which I fixed. It is easy to do with the editor. I usually do a right click to move the map. Also, access=no basically says no one can use the road. I went ahead and changed it to access=private. There are other possibilities. Check out the wiki at osm.wiki/Key:access
|
161465110 | 7 months ago | Typically we don't remove trails because they are not official, instead, we mark them as informal. Having informal trail in OSM can help rescue workers when looking for lost hikers. Please review your edit.
|
161447634 | 7 months ago | There are a number of "businesses" all operating from the same unit. Is it one business or multiple?
|
161445204 | 7 months ago | Check out Snohomish County SCOPI https://scopi.snoco.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?configBase=https://scopi.snoco.org/Geocortex/Essentials/REST/sites/SCOPI/viewers/SCOPI/virtualdirectory/Resources/Config/Default It is helpful for determining road types and names
|
161442821 | 7 months ago | #TIP: Leave brief changeset comments when saving and uploading your edit. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information
|
161361504 | 7 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
161331072 | 7 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
161318095 | 7 months ago | Instead of access=no, use access=private as you did on the bridge.
|
161293167 | 7 months ago | Can you clarify, is the road privately owned and does it have a no trespassing sign? From what I can see Bing street view imagery does not show a no trespassing.
|
161275923 | 7 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. One suggestion, a tag is needed for the laundromat. I'd suggest shop=laundry.
|
161260922 | 7 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
161248121 | 7 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
161252734 | 7 months ago | The pier is likely not open to motor vehicles, including aircraft. Typically it is just for pedestrians. Also you may want to look up moorings on the wiki. See osm.wiki/Key:mooring
|
161247881 | 7 months ago | #TIP: When removing a business, it a good to leave the address which can likely be reused. The browser editor, iD, has a tool to remove all but the address. Just right click on the business and select the ⋁ icon.
|
161219657 | 7 months ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. We typically tag the landuse of the church as such since it is all religious land. I would recommend adding it back as a lanuse=religious. See osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dreligious
|
161217146 | 7 months ago | I would suggest adding back in the tags amenity=place_of_worship, building=church, and religion=christian otherwise it will not be found in a search.
|
161186763 | 8 months ago | #TIP: OSM spells out street names - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you expand the street name?
|