This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You added a duplicate building. Please delete the duplicate building and just leave the node you added in a subsequent edit. Let me know if you need help.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167544823

This node is better than the duplicate building you added in your first edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167545591

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167545886

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

It appears you duplicated the costco store outline and added a river next to the existing stream linestring. These have been fixed.

You also added a poiygon that is tagged as a physiotherapist. Should that also be tagged as a building? Can you finish up this polygon?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167544549

I believe I have corrected the problem

That sounds good. (From my username, you can probably guess I love having glass art shops added)

Is the sidewalk removed on the south side of the street service road? Imagery still shows it there but I see the construction of a new bike lane in the area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167542167

Can you also add the type of business Convenant Art Glass is? Is it a shop=art or craft-glassblower? Let me know if you need help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167509868

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167505711

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

Thanks for adding the new development
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167500105

King County iMap does not show a residential road at this location. Looking at Bing street imagery, there is no street sign. https://www.bing.com/maps?FORM=Z9LH2&cp=47.621275%7E-122.161731&lvl=19.8&pi=-11.6&style=x&dir=205.7

All of which looks like a shared driveway, which we tag as highway=service + service=driveway.

#TIP: Street names in OSM are spelled out. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167465000

Check out our wiki page on how to map straits. osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dstrait. Using a node is preferred because the start and end of the strait is hard to determine.

Also, I'm unable to find any reference to the Segastill Passage. Where did that name come from? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167449711

It appears the houses already are tagged with their address. The address tags were added to the building outline. Can you remove the duplicate addresses? Let me know if you need help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167405489

The county shows the road as a service road. Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167404354

Thanks for the information. I have removed relation 19161871

He observado que estás eliminando áreas y luego volviéndolas a añadir con geometrías ligeramente diferentes. En lugar de hacer eso, simplemente modifica la geometría para guardar el historial del objeto.

(in English)
I noticed that you are removing areas then adding them back with slightly different geometries. Instead of doing that just modify the geometry to save the history of the object.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167443527

If you want to add an historic boundary I suggest using OpenHistoricalMap.org.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167350864

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

I have reverted this edit for going against DWG Crimera edits policy during the conflict.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167350864

The wiki discourages the user of railway=facility. See osm.wiki/Tag%3Arailway%3Dfacility. Can you change this back or let me know why you think facility is more appropriate?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167410890