https://www.cambridgema.gov/-/media/Files/Traffic/steelplaceresolution.pdf

It has been a while since I've lived in the area and so I can't go look and for all I know the shop might be gone now.

IIRC they sold all kinds of smoking accessories. That's not my cup of tea so I never went in to learn more. Their website shows mostly vapes now so shop=e-cigarette might work, but I think not all "smoke shops" sell e-cigarettes. shop=headshop might not be wrong either, but again, not every "smoke shop" sold cannabis paraphernalia.

shop=tobacco and shop=smartshop are definitely not appropriate. I don't think there are very many of those around.

I started using the shop=smoke_shop tag because that's what they call themselves and none of the other tags are close. It seemed like a reasonable time to use ATYL instead of trying to pretend it's another type of shop. I see it's been used a handful of times since then (13 total, 5 of them from me in this neighborhood).

Hi mleeeee, welcome to the OpenStreetMap community and thanks for mapping this park! I see you requested a review for this change.

These streets appear to be two-way on satellite imagery. Was the traffic pattern recently changed?

Hi Jacob, welcome to the OpenStreetMap community and thanks for mapping bicycle parking in this area! I see you requested a review for this change.

The only issue is that the bicycle parking nodes should be separate and next to the sidewalk way. Also the access=yes tag is not necessary as that is the default.

Also, I noticed you added some parking lanes in other changesets. If you want to map this information, it can be more easily added to the highway object itself using the parking:lane=* tag. A separate way would only be necessary in a parking lot or if there was some physical barrier between the road and the parking.

Let me know if you have any questions about this!

Name had been updated recently but another change was made from Organic Maps which hadn't updated yet and so accidentally reverted the name.

osm.org/note/3953637
osm.org/note/3953638
osm.org/note/3953639

Hi Sam, there is an offset of (0.6, -1.54) for Bing Imagery in Montreal. Please use this offset when aligning features. Thanks!

Deleted in osm.org/changeset/141829292