OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
40485889 almost 8 years ago

Objects are fake, and do not exist. User has had over a year to respond to changeset comments - many of the user's object additions have been shown to be bogus (repeating names and derivations of the same name; phone numbers with country/area codes from other places; bus stops on side streets and alleys that couldn't possibly accommodate a bus, etc).
Deleting/reverting.

40598962 almost 8 years ago

Objects are fake, and do not exist. User has had over a year to respond to changeset comments - many of the user's object additions have been shown to be bogus (repeating names and derivations of the same name; phone numbers with country/area codes from other places; bus stops on side streets and alleys that couldn't possibly accommodate a bus, etc).
Deleting/reverting.

40717077 almost 8 years ago

Object is fake, does not exist. User has had over a year to respond - many of the user's object additions have been shown to be bogus (repeating names and derivations of the same name; phone numbers with country/area codes from other places; bus stops on side streets and alleys that couldn't possibly accommodate a bus, etc).
Deleting.

40693154 almost 8 years ago

Object is fake, does not exist. User has had over a year to respond - many of the user's object additions have been shown to be bogus (repeating names and derivations of the same name; phone numbers with country/area codes from other places; bus stops on side streets and alleys that couldn't possibly accommodate a bus, etc).
Deleting.

51956525 almost 8 years ago

This changeset will need to be reverted, fyi.

51956777 almost 8 years ago

This changeset will need to be reverted, fyi.

51956599 almost 8 years ago

I know you're trying to help, but you just deleted a whole bunch of stuff without looking at all of the imagery. You were looking at Bing - it is old imagery.

51683549 almost 8 years ago

I owe you an apology - they switched to a different project # and I didn't notice. The project I was still working was no longer the current one - so you were fine.

51683549 almost 8 years ago

FYI - You're editing in Morang, not Sunsari. Editing in a locked sector as well.

51679649 almost 8 years ago

http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/3403#task/216

51679649 almost 8 years ago

STOP! You're editing a locked sector!

51465609 about 8 years ago

Actually - looks like it may have been Changeset #51455907 - not you

51465609 about 8 years ago

Hey there - Looks like this may have broken the main residential area in Biratnagar. Are you able to fix or revert the change?

48323870 over 8 years ago

Well no worries here - if you see flaws/errors in my work going forward, please let me know. I'll greatly appreciate it!
I'm passionate about doing this right - and I want to make sure I'm not creating more work for others.

48323870 over 8 years ago

Thx very much for the quick reply and explanation. Just so you know, the script you're running to fix these multipolygons made it appear that I was doing these correctly - I just thought that there was an automatic translation going on (the multipolygon relation would correctly change not long after I saved my work), but that the database was slow to render it.
I'm actually not running a script, so it's no problem to make this change - I'm already using this method, and I've confirmed it's working.
Just an idea... It would have been helpful to receive a brief msg as part of your bot/script/process - informing me that my multipolygons were not being created correctly.
Thx again...
GR

48323870 over 8 years ago

Hey Sebastic. I need to know what I'm doing wrong with my riverbank polylines and relations. Based on your changes, it appears that as soon as a riverbank is part of a relation, it loses the riverbank tag. Is that correct?
I wasn't aware that I was doing anything incorrectly - you've been cleaning things up with a script without notifying me that I was doing it wrong!

45706684 over 8 years ago

Well.... Just saw a source that argued that when they go over land, locals call them "snow-roads". So... whatever.
"Seasonal" it is.

45706684 over 8 years ago

Another dead giveaway: Staging areas next to rivers on the lower/down side (side of the river that goods are coming in from). On the south bank of the McKenzie where that ice-road comes ashore, you can see in the satellite imagery a couple of cleared out staging areas. When Fall comes, there eventually is enough snowpack to traverse the ice-road on land, but not enough ice on the bigger rivers to support a semi and its load. So goods are brought in and dropped on the shore, and then brought across the river when the ice is sufficiently thick. Sometimes the goods will sit there for a few days, sometimes weeks if the weather doesn't cooperate.

45706684 over 8 years ago

Hey Keith - No worries, you were completely clear, and I understand completely. I actually left the ice-road designation there on purpose, as those roads are impassible once snowmelt happens: they turn into pure mud. Even though most of the road isn't on lake or river ice, the roadbed depends on compacted snow to remain driveable.
Northerners refer to the entire seasonal road as an "ice road" - but I suppose we can mark the parts on land as "seasonal" instead.
Here's the easiest way to determine if a road is an ice-road (besides research and in-person observation). Satellite imagery is almost always from the thaw months - less cloud cover - so if the roadway appears to be extensively green and grown over, it's an ice-road. If the roadway appears to be cleared of vegetation for most of its length, it's a yearly road. Most roads above the 60th parallel are actually ice-roads.
All in all though, not a big deal. No need to change it back.

42451009 almost 9 years ago

Sorry for the bad change notes. If this is not info that should go into a way, pls let me know and I'll remove.