ja, mocht iemand met meer seamark-kennis besluiten dat inhoud van die tags toch op kaart hoort kan eenvoudig was: verwijderd.
Dank, Hans

Hi user_5359,

Mapillary is a Swedish firm developing blurring software for faces and other GDPR-sensitive elements on photos;
they accept OSM contributor's photos to train their algorithm;
they also recognise traffic signs and make those detections available to various routeplanners.

Looks like the workings behind the tag in the iD editor to enter the photo reference were changed w/o alerting users.

The 'share this image' link on www.mapillary.com/app looks like https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1094850792170039,

Why this got mangled?

Have again added tag=Mapillary and copied the share this picture link from the Mapillary website.

Thank you for picking up, as it is always harder to retrace steps when asked years later ...

Met vriendelijke groet (Dutch for 'with friendly greeting'),
Hans

Waarde abs8,

Dank voor uw opvolging van de Leugstraat in Aartsellar;

mocht wel opmerken dat
eerste stuk vanaf Boomsesteenweg gezien geen 30km is, wel 3½ton behalve ... zie : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1537932336913008&focus=photo ; heb max.speed aangepast, max.weight nog niet;

Zone 30 begint pas bij : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1645908142678419&focus=photo

Blijft, hoe aan te geven verkeer in welke richting voorgaat bij de wegversmalling?

Met overigens vriendelijke groet,

Hans

Voor mij zou het belangrijkst zijn 1/ dat het een 'koekjestrommel' model betreft, 2/ de hoogte boven de grond en 3/ de afstand links van de hoek van het gebouw - dit met het oog op slechtzienden ; het ding is aan de wand bevestigd, dan lijkt dat bevestigingspunt de correcte plek voor de node?

After thought : surprised by the existence of the Tomtom traces 21 Dec'24 - 16 Jan'25, as slip was inaccessible from early July'24, then razed and replaced : would you have a way of reaching out to TomTom to alert them, please?

(seen the 'private' email address on the 'about you' page, so : yes!)

One way to 'publish' noticed but not acted on changes : dated notes on a uMap page, publish once in a while?

Best,

Thank you for the prompt reply ; mention Mapillsry as that is often fresher than Bing or Google, as local and passing-by photographers can upload on a daily basis whereas the big names send out their scouts once in a while, then seem to take a while to process and publish.

Having said that, Antwerpen is unbelievably active updating and rearranging the underground and road infrastructure, shifting away from the reliance on motorcars introduced ca. 1970 to pedestrian, bicycle and public transport.

Could use help with updating, but this often needs local ground work to know what needs to be changed as opposed to what is largely cosmetic.

There are several regional Flemish or national Belgian government sources available: in iD one could look for 'DigitaalVlaanderen' : 'most recent' and 'preliminary' aerial imagery, and 'GRB', which is based on official Roads and Land Ownership Registry data.

But even GRB still shows the grey line for the slip road. That makes mappers undoing recent 'real world' changes to re-introduce the former situation a bane of editing OSM.

Adding concise notes what was changed and referring to photos would be one way, but also requires knowledge of the Wegcode = highway code ...

... so for now just cycling round, two cameras on the helmet to at least document what has changed and hope a distant mapper will pick the correct sequence : for example https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=897302919224104.

Thank you for picking up on the right turn restriction.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Hans

Dear Kaduna,
Don't know from where on the planet you're editing, but the way was removed after roadworks ; please refer to recent Mapillary pictures before assuming thaty locals must have overlooked this way.

Of nog anders gesteld : AEDs aangetroffen zoals op bij die AEDs gelinkte Mpy pics.